Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 6th September 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Tom English: 'Messing with the key position is a clear sign Hadden is out of ideas'



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 15 June 2008
SCOTLAND PLAYED Argentina in Buenos Aires last night? Were you watching on the web? Were you listening on the radio? Or have you been so ground down by the failures and the excuse-making of recent seasons that you're, well, not past caring exactly, but not as passionate as you used to be?
There's a lot of disaffected Scottish rugby supporters out there. I bet there are some that were hoping for a Pumas victory at Velez Sarsfield, not out of disloyalty to their country but out of desperation. In the past, one-off victories, or moral vi
ctories, have papered over many cracks and have delayed or stopped revolution taking place. This column is being written ahead of the Test for a specific reason. Win or lose, it doesn't matter. It doesn't. In the big picture, in a game between two sides dramatically weakened by injury and the vagaries of the French domestic season, whatever happened is an irrelevancy.

What is deeply relevant, though, is Frank Hadden and his continuing failure to get the best out of his players. Scotland have won two games out of their last 10 in the championship. That's one better than Matt Williams managed. They have scored four tries in their last nine Tests, not counting last night. This is pathetic, as everyone knows. It is also unrepresentative of the quality of the individual talent at Hadden's disposal. Nobody is saying they'd be championship winners in another man's hands but they wouldn't be the dregs of Europe, they wouldn't be going to Cardiff and embarrassing themselves, they wouldn't be confused by bizarre gameplans and selections week in, week out.

Gordon McKie, the SRU chief executive, must be looking for certainty in his staff. Without the knowledge that they know what they're doing, how can he have any confidence in them? Is he getting it from Hadden? Let's put to one side the defeats, the lack of tries and the flagging interest of the supporters. Hell of a job, admittedly, but let's just look at Chris Paterson and Dan Parks for a minute. How McKie can see how the fly-half slot has been tossed about between them and conclude that Hadden still knows what he's doing beggars belief.

Here's how Paterson has been used. At the World Cup he was a sub against Portugal (and came on at 10), was on the wing against Romania, at 10 against the All Blacks and back on the wing against Italy and Argentina. In the Six Nations, he was on the bench against France (and came on at 10), was selected at full-back against Wales but was moved to the wing, started at 10 against Ireland and finished at 15, started at 10 against England and was moved to the wing, selected at 10 against Italy and moved to the wing.

Parks was lamentably awful against the Italians and gifted them the game yet he kept the 10 jersey for the first Test in Argentina last week, with Paterson playing full-back. Last night Phil Godman played fly-half and Paterson was shifted to the wing. This is bonkers. Utterly insane. Messing about with the key position of fly-half is a clear sign that Hadden is out of ideas. He's moving things around in the mad hope that something will work yet there is no clear vision, no logic, no consistency.

What happens is that at times, things work but the occasional victories merely serve to show the raw capabilities of his team, particularly up front and in the sustained excellence of Mike Blair. They are nowhere as bad as performances would indicate. It's for that reason that the Scotland gig would be an attractive one to a prospective coach.

This is the perfect time for a new guy to take over. Morale is low, results are bad. Ideal. Any small improvement and you're in credit with the supporters. But there is a lot of improvement in this squad, it is just a question of getting the right man in there to bring it out of them. That man is not Frank Hadden. It may be Andy Robinson, but it's not at all clear that he wants the job. From his utterances so far, he'd rather continue at Edinburgh for the foreseeable future. That makes sense, for him and for McKie. The chief executive desperately needs his two pro teams firing on all cylinders and they're in good hands in Robinson and Lineen

Life after Frank? Here's a name. Eddie O'Sullivan. A serious rugby man, a strong character and a successful coach on the international scene. I doubt he'd play Hadden's preposterous game of musical chairs in the most important position on the field. No clear-thinking coach would. What do you say, Gordon?







The full article contains 814 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

Star o' Rabbie Burns,

New Cumnock, CUMNOCK 15/06/2008 01:22:02
Tom, We know you're Irish and are maybe sticking up for a mate in Eddie O'Sullivan - but come on.

After his disgraceful slur on Big Wagga at Murrayfield not too long ago, there is no way O'Sullivan could even be considered as Scottish coach.

In any case, during his tenure as Irish coach a squad which certainly had more talented players than he would have as Scottish coach repeatedly under-performed in the Six Nations and the RWC.

Tom, O'Sullivan is a tw*t - Hadden might not be much good, but, he's no tw*t.
2

DJ77,

Leeds 15/06/2008 01:39:40
Hadden and EOS are peas in a pod. They are both underachieving coaches who talk rubbish pre and post match
3

The Laird of Kitakyushu,

15/06/2008 06:49:14
We can always put a different spin on two victories in ten games: it is after all TWICE the number his predecessor managed! ;-)

But seriously, Monsieur English, you are right that Hadden's handling of the number 10 position has been awful. Parks plays well for Scotland about 20% of the time he is on the field, and that stat is quite simply not good enough. (Take his opening kick-off in the Six Nations, out on the full for heaven's sake. I knew there and then that it would be a tough campaign for Scotland.)

I don't know if Eddie O'S would be the answer. (It depends, of course, on what the question is ;-) What about Rob Moffat? He seems to be doing OK with Scotland A and we don't really want to move Lineen or Robinson too soon from their pro teams where they are doing sterling work.
4

The Laird of Kitakyushu,

15/06/2008 06:55:16
P.S. I know nothing really about Rob Moffat and just tossed his name into the ring (barracuda tank?) to see what people say.

Is this him?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Robert_Moffat.jpg
I must say he has nice kindly eyes and a Father Christmas beard, should be ideal for the role!
5

thebigiam,

15/06/2008 10:23:55
I kind of agree with the conclusion, but not the argument to get there. We've been lacking creativity, so of course Hadden is going to try different things.

Time to give Godman a bit of a run, to grow into the role at international level - if he can hold off the challenge of Paterson at Edinburgh.

If there is to be a change of coach, can't say O'Sullivan would be my first choice, not least because of the Hines incident.

How about Loffreda?!
6

Honest Opinion 2,

Froggyland 15/06/2008 11:47:39
Great result for the Scots - well done indeed guys. I don't quite see the light at the end of the tunnel but there is definitely a faint glow. Re the stand-off topic, we have a great crop of number 9's do we not? They've had to be to counteract the puerile and sterile performance at No 10 - so thats a positive. So, where to now?
Time to use the subs is now:
Habben out - Triumverate of Big Barnesy (Head Coach - Motivator), Alan Tait/Tooney(Backs) and Fin Calder (or similar absasive braveheart) for the forwards. Give Godman or Paterson an exrended run at No 10 and wave goodbye to Parksey. Kick out McKie while we're at it and replace him with a real rugby man with commercial experience - John Rutherford perhaps? If a change is required, lets make it a brave and pragnatic one.
7

Hoop,

Carnoustie 15/06/2008 12:21:24
"...and replace him with a real rugby man with commercial experience - John Rutherford perhaps?"

Or Jim Aitken...
8

imch,

15/06/2008 12:57:18
Can I just echo what the first poster said.

I'd also like to ask Tom, you are either on the serious wind up or you have no idea about rugby, which is it?
9

Stoo,

15/06/2008 13:07:47
Imch - if you have read some of his stuff over the years you will realise he knows nothing about the game. He's a tube, best ignored.
10

Thane of Kirkcaldy,

Dancing in the Streets of Raith 15/06/2008 14:25:36
Eddie O'Sullivan !!!!!
Speaking personally I would never return to Murrayfield again if this sleekit individual was given the coaching job of my country. Sad as I've gone man and boy since 1968. Forget it Mr English - unacceptable suggestion.
11

Honest Opinion 2,

Froggyland 15/06/2008 15:42:25
OK Hoop,
If you want someone more obviously cerabral - How about Bill Gammell? My point is simple, there are many men who have the sport at heart, the Scottish Psyche in their attitude and with sufficient commercial experience to run a difficult and emootive business like the SRU. McKie is by no means irreplaceable and with the list of debacles at his doorstep still growing (London Scottish the most recent) - he can go tomorrow for me - and I would think the vast majority of Scottish Rugby supporters.
12

Stoo,

15/06/2008 18:27:24
What debacles has McKie overseen?
13

The Chiel,

15/06/2008 18:56:27
I thought there was some credibility in this article until the last paragraph. EOS - a complete, totally discredited busted flush without honour who could get nothing out of a talented Irish squad at the last RWC. I'd rather keep Hadden - and there's something I never thought I would type !
14

rico suave,

15/06/2008 18:57:14
what a disgustingly negative article to have the whole back page of the sports section the day after our first ever win on Argentinian soil. The scotsman surpasses itself again. well done scotland and well done the coaching staff. everyone is fair to criticise after losses but credit where credit is due after such a good win.
15

John Brown,

Glasgow 15/06/2008 20:08:46
Scotland do not need a Scotland coach, or management team. We have only 2 professional teams each of whom have large coaching staffs. No Magners league matches currently take place during either the Autumn tests or 6 Nations windows, therefore utilise existing fixed costs salaries of Glasgow and Edinburgh coaches to do the same role with Scotland. Save the cash to eventually get 4 professional teams in Scotland, by the way serious prunning of structures at Murrayfield should also be undertaken, what qualifications does the Head of Domestic rugby have to hold position?
16

jdships,

16/06/2008 08:16:58
" Life after Frank? Here's a name. Eddie O'Sullivan. A serious rugby man, a strong character and a successful coach on the international scene. I doubt he'd play Hadden's preposterous game of musical chairs in the most important position on the field. No clear-thinking coach would. What do you say, Gordon? "

Even you must admit EOS was "tried and found guilty " years ago
Sorry Mr English if you are going to write tripe like that suggest you find a new job or alternatively move to reporting Flower Shows, Church Bazaars etc.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.