Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 17th May 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Scotland 15-9 England: Written off Scotland step up to mark at last



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 10 March 2008
WRITTEN off after three demoralising defeats and with confidence levels decidedly shaky, Scotland rose from the gloom to produce a display brimming with passion, courage and intelligence to secure the Calcutta Cup for a second time in three years.
Some will point to the horrendous rain and gusty winds as being the reason Scotland outsmarted their English visitors in the RBS Six Nations Championship once again, and others might remember only the high kicks and defensive effort. But even though there were no line-breaks, far less Scottish tries, this winning performance was about much more than that.

This was the day when the lessons of the defeats over the past two years, and the recent Rugby World Cup, were acted upon by players; when a blend of youth and experience finally resulted in a solid performance and when a level of maturity and team work that many had feared was lost was uncovered.

One moment, in particular, defined this game. Jonny Wilkinson lining up a penalty is a sight that has induced dread in opposition fans for the past decade, but on Saturday it pinpointed instead the fragility of England's performance.

When Wilkinson and Phil Vickery, England's powerful and experienced tighthead prop and captain, discussed a penalty award a few metres into Scotland's half just three minutes before the interval their decision to kick proved pivotal.

One expected Vickery to ask Wilkinson to launch the ball and provide a platform for the forwards to then drive Scotland over the try-line. But Wilkinson clearly did not fancy his chances from more than 50 metres out as the wind and rain swirled around Murrayfield and the message was clear: the English pack did not fancy taking on Scotland's forwards at a five-metre driving lineout. Crucially, Wilkinson fell short with his effort.

This was the point where Scotland found a psychological edge, and though the game was within a converted score right until the final whistle the deficit could have been greater because England neither had the belief nor the energy to break down Scotland.

This was no accident. For all that the visitors looked a bedraggled bunch by the finish and were guilty of a woeful lack of imagination and creativity, the quality of the Scottish play and decision-making in key areas had laid the foundations for the outcome. Frank Hadden, the Scotland coach, had said in The Scotsman on the morning of the match that he was pinning much on Scotland building confidence in the first 20 minutes in this game. In truth, much of the first quarter was scrappy, but Scotland set the tone.

The forwards took on the heavier England pack aggressively to win a good share of ball and, with the experienced combination of Simon Taylor, Mike Blair and Chris Paterson orchestrating the attacks, Scotland ran England all over Murrayfield with different modes of attack: high balls, long kicks, box-kicks, off-the-top lineouts, wide, running attacks, and tight, battering pick-and-drives.

The hosts coped with squint English lineout throws, a few errors of their own and a huge tactical switch in only the 20th minute, when Rory Lamont collided with Ian Balshaw. The right wing should have kicked the ball into touch, as there was little he could do with the ball in hand a metre from the touchline in the face of advancing Englishmen and no support, but he bravely tried to gather and retain possession and was caught by the left knee of Balshaw, who had slid in to challenge. After a lengthy delay while Lamont was treated and stretchered off, Scotland brought on Dan Parks at stand-off and moved Chris Paterson to the wing.

England resumed with a penalty because Scotland flanker Allister Hogg had taken out an England player with an off-the-ball tackle in the Lamont aftermath. England kicked to touch and drove at the Scottish line, but were repelled until securing another penalty. They kicked to touch again and drove, but the Scots drove back at them in the tackle. Eventually, England were forced into errors and Nathan Hines hauled Richard Wigglesworth into touch.

The English pack then had three scrums inside the Scottish 22, during which the hosts lost hooker Ross Ford to an ankle injury and were forced to press 24-year-old Fergus Thomson into the fray after just five fleeting appearances from the bench. The home side emerged from this phase of play with a penalty conceded for a scrum binding offence, which Jonny Wilkinson converted to level the scores and overtake Neil Jenkins' world record of 1090 points.

However, the Scottish forwards knew who had won that little battle, and so did their England counterparts. Paterson slotted another three points from Scotland's next attack, Wilkinson missed the long-range effort he had debated with Vickery, and the Scots hit the mark again just before the half-time whistle, though luck was with Paterson as he hit it flat and it still sailed straight between the uprights.

The hosts went into the break 9-3 ahead and with the wind in their sails.

Straight from the second-half restart, Andrew Sheridan handed Scotland the initiative with a penalty at the first ruck in front of his own posts. Paterson nailed the penalty, and when Parks struck a fine 50-metre effort eight minutes later, there was a feeling that Scotland might again defy the odds.

Wilkinson kept a lid on early celebrations with two swift penalties in reply, both from Scottish errors, but the fly-half then faded. The introduction of Jason White for Scott MacLeod after an hour lifted both the Scottish crowd and Paul Sackey, the England winger – who White drove back several yards and dumped. Scotland pushed play into England's half for the final quarter and were more comfortable than the score suggested. The sight of England's leaders Vickery and Wilkinson being replaced underlined the visitors' misery.

This was far from an error-free Scotland display. Hadden's side were beaten in the lineout, conceded more free-kicks, spent less time in possession in both halves, had fewer line-breaks and messed up overlaps. But their defence was tighter than of late, they played with composure, concentration and as a team, and made good decisions.

Scotland: H Southwell; R Lamont, S Webster, G Morrison, N Walker; C Paterson, M Blair; A Jacobsen, R Ford, E Murray, N Hines, S MacLeod, A Strokosch, S Taylor, A Hogg. Subs: D Parks for Lamont (21), R Lawson for Blair (76), A Dickinson for Jacobsen (64), F Thomson for Ford (25), C Smith for Murray (68), J White for MacLeod (63), K Brown for Hogg (72).

England: I Balshaw; P Sackey, J Noon, T Flood, L Vainikolo; J Wilkinson, R Wigglesworth; A Sheridan, L Mears, P Vickery, S Shaw, S Borthwick, T Croft, N Easter, M Lipman. Subs: M Tait for Flood (66), C Hodgson for Wilkinson (70), G Chuter for Mears (67), M Stevens for Vickery (70), B Kay for Shaw (66), L Narraway for Lipman (73).

The full article contains 1190 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 09 March 2008 10:34 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Calcutta Cup , Six Nations
 
1

Manila,

Makati 10/03/2008 05:25:59
Scottish forwards were good (Especially 2nd and back rows)
Backs defended okay but never looked like scoring a try (what's that? One try in the tournament thus far!).
England were absolutely gash.
2

Manila,

Makati 10/03/2008 05:34:01
And one other thing: we MUST get rid of 'Flower Of Scotland'. If it still sounds a dirge (as it did on Saturday) at Murrayfield versus England with 75,000 people then it truly has no hope.

Please, please end it now. It's embarassing. Other nations are laughing at it - seriously. A new Post-Krankies low for the nation.
3

inoui,

Jomtien 10/03/2008 07:44:04
Any chance of a try from anyone looked doubtfull given it was pissing down and blowing a gale.
4

Spoot,

Third rock pool on the left 10/03/2008 07:50:41
"Scotland ... conceded more free kicks". Your reporter wouldn't mean penalties, would he? There is a difference. Very pleased to learn from #2 that the capacitity of Murrayfield has been increased by 7500.

Another wretched refereeing display from Jonathan Kaplan - how does he get away with it?
5

Panic,

Eastbourne 10/03/2008 08:28:03
Well done Scotland. There was only one side that looked like winning. England were abject and all the headlines feature the latest failure of St Jonny, but that is unfair. Scotland showed the first shoots of an attacking strategy, the press should concentrate on the reemergence of Scottish pride on the field.
As to Kaplan, the only defence I can think of for him is that he is even handed in his idiosynchratic ideas about the rules of the game. In Kaplanworld all lineout throws are straight, forward passes don't exist, and offsides rarely if ever occur. Equally holding onto the ball for 0.33 seconds after the tackle is a red card offence (or should be).
6

Venachar,

10/03/2008 08:32:49
Get Magners League sponsorship for the refs and touch judges and get them to Specsavers. Even the myopic commentators Butler & Moore could not understand how the west stand touch judge and Mr Kaplan did not pick up on at least 4 or 5 lineouts that were way out.

The standard of refs in this competition has been woefull.

Well done to the players for an improved performance and the win.

7

David Blaine, Mystery magical illusionist,

10/03/2008 08:41:16
Maybe Rory Lamont and Kaplan are jinxed?

Wasn't he the ref when Rory had his first major head injury after being taking out off the ball by a horde of dirty, filthy, cheating, cowardly, goatee bearded, pasta munching, crying, chest beating surrender monkeys at the RWC?
8

scooter,

10/03/2008 08:45:40
Jeez, c'mon you lot! 6 comments as I post this, 5 of them negative!

It may not have been festival rugby and it doesn't magically fix all Scotland's ills - but they won. They played with character, pride, determination and mental strength. They outplayed a bigger and heavier pack in conditions that favour bigger, heavier packs.

So give these guys a break. Hope both players and coaches take some courage through to this weekend and manage to build on this.

Oh, and Mr. Ferguson: I'm sure Rory L will be very grateful for your advice. Of course he should have kicked it into touch - just like a certain Mr. Parks did earlier in the season. And lost us a score when he missed it. Lamont went down on the ball, one presumes, because of that lesson: and did the right thing in the conditions. Suggest you stick to drinking tea with your fellow hacks and leave the coaching elsewhere.
9

archie23,

london 10/03/2008 09:04:03
>2 Manila,Makati 10/03/2008 05:34:01

So some 'other nations' are laughing at Flower of Scotland...

Pull the other one.

Except for some miserable English people who don't like the sentiments 'other nations' either don't give the Scottish anthem any thought or like the French and Italians are impressed with the way Scots fans belt it oot.
10

Lederblix,

10/03/2008 09:50:51
Never mind about Flower of Scotland, first of all let's play in Scottish jerseys of dark blue instead of the over-styled abortions that they've been wearing recently
11

Southsider once upon a time,

10/03/2008 09:50:57
Been in many sporting (& other) venues when Flower of Scotland has been hailed as an inspiration. It reflects the gutsy Scottish character and resolve.
12

daffy_b,

10/03/2008 10:36:53
Flower of Scotland IS inspirational.

The problem is that it is played and sung at too slow a tempo - so it sounds like a dirge.

Up the tempo and the gusto, and thus up the inspiration level.

Make it sound like a march.
13

EDINBURGH'S FINEST,

TOILETS MURRAYFIELD 10/03/2008 11:01:07
So all is well. Frank the w----- beat the auld enemy, the Scotsman had a booklet about Bannockburn in Saturdays paper (what was that all about????)and the Scottish try machine rolls of to Rome for a final win of the season against the Italians and Frank the w----- will have achieved his targets for this years six nations of 2 victories and will remain in position for the next 100 years.
RUBBISH
Scotland recorded a win against England - well done.
Scotland have scored 1 try in the championship
Scotland were SHOCKING on saturday england marginally worse.
A club side has won the triple crown and looks like winning the grand slam.
Dan Parks is a liability
Brian Moore was right - why do we need 2 bloody tornadoes flying over Murrayfield/ away to Iraq and get on with your jobs
Flower of Scotland has finally wilted - a bloody joke.lets have the Monkees theme tune as our anthem and all belt it out.
wasn't the saltire in the east stand amazing - what a waste of paper
Again Brian Moore was right whoever you tossers were booing when Lamont was injured should be identified and BANNED from all future matches at Murrayfield.
However the barbours will be horsing how great a day out it was and that they thought Scotland were amazing, the atmosphere was amazing and the whole game was brilliant - they obviously do not get out too much nor stand in all weathers on the touchline in Club rugby or school rugby week in week out.
Hadden must now RESIGN with immediate effect. The guy is useless what did he coach about Saturday's performance?
14

HEN BROON 5,

10/03/2008 11:04:43
Balshaws tackle on Rory Lamont was illegal, dangerous, and a cynical cheap shot. At no point in a rugby players career are they taught to slide into a player who is in possesion with both knees up, for the very reason that we saw, and the potential for fatal results. Balshaw is lucky he is not in jail. He should have been red carded and cited.

If as the excusers of Balshaw are claiming it was an accident:

Why did he take the ball from the arms of an unconcious Lamont and play it?

Why did he not put the ball out of play, and ensure that Lamont received immediate treatment?

Why did he slide in feet first with his knees up instead of jumping over Lamont and coming back on side?

Lamont has been criticised for not kicking the ball out, rubbish. He was obeying his natural instinct as a rugby player and taking possesion of the ball with a view to keeping it in play and preventing the line out and attempted rolling maul by England.

White and Hines were immense and out muscled the thuggish tendency of England shocking them into humility and taking the game into their faces, which they do not like as they are to arrogant for their own good.

Well done lads you have made your nation very proud of you and SENT THEM HOME WARD TO THINK AGAIN :o)

ALBA GU BRATH.
15

Sports Insider,

10/03/2008 11:54:41
#14
A player can not be red carded AND cited.

A red card can be issued by the referee during the match.
A citing can only be made after a match for an offence which was either not spotted by the officials or went unpunished.
A player can not be cited if the referee has penalised the offending player either by awarding a penalty, yellow or red card.
The onus is now on the Scotland team management ot the match commissioner to cite Balshaw. Given the weather conditions it is probable that this incident will be put down to an accidental collision.
16

Major General Puffin-Stuff,

10/03/2008 13:33:21
#13

EDINBURGH'S FINEST - so ironic, lol!! (aka bitter English troll)

I really admire your attempted spoiling tactics on every single thread concerning Scotland's victory over "title chasing" England, but suggest you must have spent the whole match in the place you appear to be posting from, i.e. the Murrayfield toilets (possibly being literally sick at the England team's pathetic performance)
17

TonyB,

10/03/2008 13:43:23
The conditions pretty much dictated that who ever won this game it would an'ugly' win. No conditions for wide and expansive play. The conditions levelled the playing field to an extent an Scotland played the conditions better (again) that their much vaunted southern cousins.
The real test of progress is to see if this team can win in the more sublime conditions of a Roman spring day.

18

TonyB,

10/03/2008 13:44:57
Having just read that I really need to get a thesaurus and come up with a different word than 'conditions'.

Suggestions welcome.
19

MM,

Edinburgh 10/03/2008 13:49:31
#15 Sports Insider

You are correct to state that a player cannot be red carded AND cited, however in Internationals a player CAN be cited even if they were penalised or even yellow carded. Regulation 17.6.2, paras (b) & (c).

I will now Red Card (but not cite) myself for having no life. Consider my coat well and truly got...
20

Major General Puffin-Stuff,

10/03/2008 13:53:06
#13

EDINBURGH'S FINEST (ROFL!!) if indeed Scottish must be the best possible example of the fabled Caledonian Cringe.
21

Major General Puffin-Stuff,

10/03/2008 14:20:59
Surprising how the most distinguished rugby commentators among the leading English press saw the match very differently from EDINBURGH'S FINEST, closeted as he was in the Murrayfield toilets - secret cottager?
22

Media 1,

cape town 10/03/2008 15:29:07
So Scotland play like school kids against other teams,but manage to find some form and passion against England?
THAT IS SHOCKING!
They should be ashamed and Hadden should be fired.
You cant just play against England and have no interest agains the rest. What is that? Shocking
23

HEN BROON 5,

10/03/2008 21:15:00
15 Sports Insider,10/03/2008 11:54:41


You are correct, I should have said, "red carded or cited," I stand by what I said.

Balshaw had plenty time to abort his tackle by simply lifting of and jumping over Lamont. You could see that he knew what he had done yet he continued with attempting to play.

A double knee tackle is one of the most dangerous tackles in the game.
24

HEN BROON 5,

10/03/2008 21:16:31
22 Media 1,cape town 10/03/2008 15:29:07


Please fuk of you agitating trolling scum bag, you are depriving your village of it's idiot.
25

HEN BROON 5,

10/03/2008 21:17:18
21 Major General Puffin-Stuff,10/03/2008 14:20:59


He must be out earning his rent ;o)
26

CROSSED GEORGE,

England 11/03/2008 01:20:48
Would you all be so proud of your national anthem if is was about another having a pop at another country rather than England?. I think it would probably be banned.
27

CROSSED GEORGE,

England 11/03/2008 01:24:53
I guess Archie 23 of London is another one of you who has joined the English Gravy train looking for more money, whilst still showing the obvious bigoted attitude to us English.
28

Major General Puffin-Stuff,

11/03/2008 09:40:39
#26,#27

Away home and read the words!

It's about self-defence and repelling an invader (who happens to be English (my, weren't they naughty and did that more than a few times..........), you numptie, rather than having a pop at England per se - enjoyable activity though that is, especially when they expect to win and don't like it up 'em!!

They are hundreds of thousands of English who, either for financial gain or the obvious better quality of life, live happily among us - some even vote SNP!
29

Trevor Cliche, Media Adviser, Camp Haddock,

11/03/2008 16:41:22
#26 how does the 2nd verse of God Save the Queen go old boy?

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.