Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


United will not appeal Fletcher's Uefa suspension again

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 12 May 2009
MANCHESTER United have ruled out any further attempt to overturn Darren Fletcher's Champions League final ban after Uefa rejected an appeal against the Scot's red card in their semi-final triumph over Arsenal last week.
Although United were afforded the right of a further appeal it was made clear in yesterday's Uefa ruling that the Old Trafford club stood little chance of success of a reprieve for the Scotland midfielder.

Barcelona's protests over defenders Eri
c Abidal and Dani Alves were also rejected by Uefa's control and disciplinary committee, and those players too will miss the final in Rome on 27 May.

A United spokesman said: "Darren is an honest player and we felt we should do what we could to try and help him become eligible for the Champions League final by initially protesting his dismissal.

"However, we respect the referee's decision and we will therefore not be appealing against today's ruling."

Uefa said both United and Barcelona had missed the deadline for filing a protest but that there were no grounds for overturning suspensions in any case.

The ban will come as a huge blow for Fletcher, a non-playing substitute at last season's final, who was sent off by Italian referee Roberto Rosetti for denying Arsenal's Cesc Fabregas a goal-scoring chance – television replays showed, however, he seemed to have won the ball.

Abidal's red card against Chelsea was also viewed as harsh though Alves' caution that will see him miss the final looked straightforward.

A Uefa statement said: "Even if they had been admitted they would have been rejected as unfounded as there were no grounds for contesting the referees' original decisions."

Meanwhile, Barcelona midfielder Andres Iniesta is confident he will be fit for the final against United after tests yesterday showed no long-term damage to his right thigh. Iniesta, who scored the dramatic semi-final goal against Chelsea that earned Barca a place in the final, sustained the injury in Sunday night's 3-3 draw with Villarreal at the Nou Camp and it was feared he would miss the Rome showpiece.

But the 25-year-old is optimistic he will be fit to line up against Ferguson's side.

He underwent tests on the injury yesterday, after which he told Sportnewspaper: "I will be in Rome. It is a small tear that wasn't as bad as we thought. From here until the final I will only think about Rome.

"The desire that I have to play in this final is going to help (my recovery] a lot."





The full article contains 429 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 12 May 2009 12:24 AM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Champions' League
 
1

Bemused and above it all,

12/05/2009 13:17:30
Isnt it a bit over hyped the fletcher thing?

Lets face it, if a scottish team were playing an italian team, winning meant they got through to the next round of the CL & their defensive midfielder made a challenge from behind, albeit winning the ball but clearly coming across the front of the striker, in what was deemed a reckless challenge, wouldnt we be saying the c##t desrved it?

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.