Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Tuesday, 7th October 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Spartans urge SFL chairmen to buy into 'vision'



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 01 July 2008
SPARTANS yesterday moved to allay serious concerns over their bid to be admitted to the SFL and urged league chairmen to recognise the 'visionary' nature of their proposal.
The East of Scotland side were left stunned by news that they had been given zero marks in 11 of 15 judging categories following an inspection of their facilities by a recent SFL delegation. With construction of a hugely impressive £3.5 million commu
nity ground to the north of the capital well on the road to completion, the club feel they have made a strong case for inclusion in the leagues.

However, following site inspections at the grounds of rivals Cove Rangers, Preston Athletic, Edinburgh City and Annan Athletic, Spartans were ranked a lowly four out of five in the criteria laid down by the SFL. Although the markings are intended only for information purposes, and not a suggestion as to who to vote for, the inspection report has been seen as a blow to the club's hopes of replacing Gretna later this week.

Spartans were the only bidding club asked to fill out a supplementary, 25-point questionnaire and were also summoned to SFL offices at Hampden on Wednesday to ease concerns over the fact their new Ainslie Park ground will not be ready until September, as well as issues surrounding funding, safety of match officials, crowd capacity, fan base and player budget. Spartans – whose profile has been dramatically raised in recent seasons by their impressive Scottish Cup exploits and who, on Friday, became the first senior team to receive the SFA's Quality Mark Community Club Award praising their local links – are confident they have met all the points raised by the SFL and are hopeful the concerns do not scupper their bid in Thursday's vote.

Colin Hutchison, Spartans' general secretary and director, commented: "We don't actually receive the scoring, but from what we are led to believe in the press, we scored 'nil points' for our facilities. If that is the case, that is a major shock to us because we showed the SFL officials round here and two of our committee were also summoned back to Hampden last Wednesday, and we received no indication that's where things stacked with us. With a £3.5 million investment programme it was a major surprise and a disappointment. If I had one message for the voting clubs on Thursday it would be to look to the future and be visionary.

"We had Forfar manager Dick Campbell round here and he said 'I see a building site, guys, but I see the vision'. So many people have committed to that, including Gordon Strachan, our patron. Everybody that comes here comes out with the 'wow' factor. Is this the future of Scottish football? We believe it is and we're very proud of what we've done so far. We hope the chairmen see that and vote for us on Thursday."



The full article contains 493 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 30 June 2008 11:24 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

r1niceboy,

yankeeland 01/07/2008 08:26:30
Glaswegians buying into a vision?

Whichever team has the straightest lines painted on their pitch will win. Christ knows why Elgin are a league team. They don't have the fan base, a vision, or the facilities. Spartans have a youth system that will be the basis for long-term financial and match success. They won't get it because the SFL would rather have a team that throws money at foreign duffers.

I trust the SFL to make the wrong decision.
2

Who?,

01/07/2008 09:17:11
There is a very thin line between having vision and dillusion- wonder which the sfl have?

I still find it strange that spartans knew their ground wouldn't be ready until september, knew their squad wasn't up to sfl standards and know they don't have the supportbase to make a success in the league yet still went ahead. Not only that but their ground will only have a capacity of just over 500. They are not allowed to stand people on the grass yet they were vain enough to include that capacity in their bid document.

Spartans are best off out of the league setup. They got well whacked by a junior team in the cup this season and would have struggled against league opposition.

If spartans got in it would all end in tears!
3

Langenburger,

01/07/2008 10:59:41
The timing of the Spartans application may not be the best for them but they did not know Gretna would fold and their vision was for the future not just league entry.
Theirs is a long term vision and commitment and yes they might not win the league the first year - but Caley Thistle and Ross County took a few years to bed down too. None of the current applicants will show well in the league in their first year - and none are expected to.
Spartans are well grounded and well run and their commitment to the total community puts many "bigger" clubs to shame.
The abject nonsense for all the applicants is that they are being judged against criteria that would have precluded many of the current members.
But you know what I think the chairmen will make the right decision and in time there will be the pyramid system in place and maybe one day the Junior clubs will want to be part of it all.
4

hendo 26,

02/07/2008 00:00:19
spartans got humped 5 nil fae linlithgow rose who r juinors in the scottish cup they wont b nearly strong enough 2 compete in div 3 cove won the highland league so they get my vote best equipped team 2 compete in div 3

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.