Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

The hunt is On.
Sponsored by
Can you track down Scotland's wildest beastie?
 
 
Wednesday, 3rd December 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Jacobsen says sorry for woeful Edinburgh show



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 13 October 2008
HONEST Allan "Chunk" Jacobsen was in no mood for self delusion after Edinburgh opened their Heineken European Cup campaign with a 16-27 home defeat to Leinster which he labelled "unacceptable" and "depressing".
In apologising to fans for the collective non-display – the Dubliners had the bonus point win wrapped up when their fourth try went in even before half-time – Jacobsen effectively acknowledged that Edinburgh were little better than the team that has
finished bottom of their group for the last four years.

"That first half was unacceptable. I know the boys feel the same. We were just terrible in that first half."

However, Jacobsen rightly qualified his remarks by clinging to the hope that Edinburgh can sustain a second-half performance that saw them come back from 3-24 just before the interval.

"What we were doing in the second half we have to do from the start, and I don't think that's something you can train to do. You just have to be mentally right to do it, and we weren't.

"Next week we go to France and we will have to be right," added the internationalist, who at least figured in one of the more solid aspects of Edinburgh's performance – the scrimmage.

Overall, though, and despite his best efforts, team-man Jacobsen was inclined to hold his hands up for the dressing-room. Echoing what he'd said over the PA system while receiving an award for long service, the 30-year-old added: "I said at the end I had to apologise for the way we played in the first half and I know the boys, who are gutted, just gutted, feel the same. Everybody was guilty. We just missed one-on-one tackles (and) against those kind of players you are going to get punished.

"There's no reason for that, no excuse. It's a personal thing. It was everyone's fault. It was a bit of everything. Sometimes it is somebody making a mistake; sometimes it was guy's exposed because somebody else was not working hard enough and there was too much room to cover.

"You can take some comfort from the way we came back – but, we say that time and time again, blah, blah, blah."

Unable to answer why Edinburgh defended so poorly, Jacobsen posed a rhetorical question of his own; when are we going to change from being the gallant fight-backers?

He said: "We are just sick of it and it's hard to put your finger on things. We got told what to do in training and we train (for) what to do. (Then) we turn up in the first half and don't do it, although in the second half we are able to employ our tactics."

It has to be a moot point that Leinster were content on holding what they had, given the margin of their lead, and Jacobsen was big enough to concede this point.

He said: "At the end of the day it was unacceptable the way we performed from (no's) 1-15 in that first half. Depressing...

"There were a lot of mistakes they capitalised on and although we fought back in the European Cup against a team like Leinster you can't afford to give starts; you can't afford to give anybody starts.

"I've played in games where we have had bigger beatings. This time we had expectations of ourselves and our supporters expected more of us, so to go out and play like that first up at home leaves you battling to get through.

"We've got to perform week in, week out, for 80 minutes and we are not doing it.

"We'll train knowing we have to put it right not just in practice but in a game which we aim to do next week."

In raking through the ashes, the resolute Jacobsen at least showed himself to be in touch with the view from the terraces – one clarion call heard as the second half began was "c'mon Edinburgh, give us our money's worth" , although whether or not that fan felt suitably recompensed at the end of the match will never be known.

What is clear is that with Edinburgh heading now for Castres, by repeating that ineptitude they will, in rugby terms, be well and truly castrat...(you get the drift).

A team who had notched tries in just one of their five previous matches required a penalty try to get them over the whitewash here, which in itself is alarming although of more concern was the quality of Edinburgh's non-defence.

Attacking first of all from south to north at Murrayfield, it seemed Leinster could have started their moves in Morningside Road and still Edinburgh could not have been able to muster their forces in time to repel danger, so leaden-footed were they.

If Alastair Darling had spent the week plugging holes, at least his rescue plan for the financial markets was not quite sunk totally without trace in the same way that Edinburgh coach Andy Robinson's rearguard strategies were.

First up will be to look at the composition of the back row who, while all had moments individually, were given a lesson in swift re-grouping from disparate parts to erect barriers at breakdowns.

On the subject of approaches, Edinburgh had a mere couple, so far as a back division forced to watch what significant line-breaks there were come from forwards – Jim Hamilton and Alan MacDonald especially.

By contrast with that frontal duo, Edinburgh's lacklustre backs either employed the attacking hoof up the pitch from midfield forward to the Leinster 22, or the defensive hoof up pitch from their own 22 to midfield.

Either way, Edinburgh were a shambles and lacking the going-forward edge that took, in sequence, Rocky Elsom, Brian O'Driscoll, Felipe Contepomi and Shane Horgan in behind their lines.

To say that Leinster's second try contained not so much a forward pass as the equivalent of a baton-change in an athletics relay would be true but it would also be splitting hairs, given that the visitors missed an easy penalty and enjoyed overall superiority.

It was a day when they not so much overcame a Murrayfield bogey, mostly experienced against the coaching prowess of Frank Hadden and Todd Blackadder, as laid to waste any jinx based on one win from eight previous visits.

At least Edinburgh, whose other points came from the boot of both Phil Godman and Chris Paterson, live to hopefully fight another day with seemingly minimal injuries, although the same might not be said for their current coach according to those television commentators who fear Andy Robinson "might have blown a gasket" in looking to explain his extended perambulation from the stands to the touchline and the glare of cameras in order to protest a refereeing decision.

Sounds painful; then again it was that sort of a day for the majority in a crowd of 5376.

Scorers:

Edinburgh: Try: penalty try. Con: Paterson. Pens: Paterson (2), Godman.

Leinster: Tries: Elsom, O'Driscoll, Contempomi, Horgan. Con: Contempomi (2). Pen: Contempomi.

Edinburgh: Paterson, Robertson (Houston, 50), Southwell ( D Blair, 77), De Luca, Webster, Godman, M Blair, captain, Jacobsen, Ford, Cross, Mustchin, J Hamilton (Gissing, 59), Newlands (C Hamilton, 72), Hogg, MacDonald.

Leinster: Dempsey, Horgan, O'Driscoll (Sexton, 78), Fitzgerald, Kearney, Contepomi, Whitaker (Keane, 68), Wright, Jackman (Fogarty, 73), Van der Linde, Cullen, captain, Toner, Elsom, Heaslip, Jennings.

Referee: Mr R Debney (England).





The full article contains 1241 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 13 October 2008 12:02 PM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Edinburgh rugby
 
1

jbascotinengland,

13/10/2008 13:26:03
I didn't see the game but it sounds like the same old rubbish from a Scottish team.

This article runs on the same formula as almost every piece written by a player after a 6N match for the last umpteen season; "We lost, we weren't good enough, we're sorry for the fans, it hurts to lose, we'll be better next time..."

What has happened to the Edinburgh team of last year?! After such a good season Edinburgh should be challenging at the top of the league, winning Heineken cup matches and starting to draw bigger crowds. But as always, as soon as something good starts we manage to do our best to ruin it.

I've always thought that the choice of pro-teams over clubs was the right one but if the teams can't do better then perhaps it is time to look at different options.
2

Nacker,

Edinburgh 13/10/2008 14:28:26
I was at the game, and neither wonder Jacobsen is apologising. Too short & too unfit. He can't do too much about the former, but he could keep out of Greggs for a few days a week and improve the latter.

Edinburgh were a shambles and I doubt Andy Robinson will be hanging around with these imposters much longer.

Too many egos, too few winners.

3

Slasher McGurk,

13/10/2008 14:49:50
I was there. No aggression, no organisation and no imagination. How Chris Paterson gets a game i will never know, apart from two ten yard dashes, both of wich he, lost the ball in contact, he was mince. He does not have the brain to play at FB, i did not see one well executed tactical kick.
4

Foresight,

By the Water of Leith 13/10/2008 15:54:28

Having watched Edinburgh being trounced by Leinster on Saturday it seems that the only credible conclusion that can be drawn from the game, especially when taking into account Glasgow's demise in Wales, that the SRU is slowly but surely squeezing the life blood out of Scottish rugby. It is eminently clear to any rational thinker on the game of rugby that Scotland is being left behind by other countries almost certainly because of a lack of funds, yet the SRU you clings to its monopolistic position, refusing to address the question of how to bring more money into the sport in fear of losing its controlling iron grip.

The funds needed to expand the game in Scotland must come from sources other than the SRU. Such funds will not be forthcoming until Edinburgh and Glasgow are wound up and would be investors can be attracted to supporting premier clubs, after all this is the bedrock of the sport and further the Heineken Cup is a club competition and not really a competition for international training squads.
5

macdowall,

13/10/2008 16:05:28
I was at the game and the gunners were poor. However, the ref and linesman had a howler the forward pass led to a try, upto that point there was only 4 points in it. Also, no mention of the fact that the officials were booed off at half time.

The problem has nothing to do with money, basically most of the Scotland team lost to Leinster at Murrayfield on Saturday. I wish Andy Robinson well he is a performance coach and is too good for this bunch of losers that don't care. At least he had the balls to front up to the match officials after another atrocious high tackle by Contempi.
6

DJ77,

Leeds 13/10/2008 21:43:15
"Such funds will not be forthcoming until Edinburgh and Glasgow are wound up and would be investors can be attracted to supporting premier clubs,"

Yawn - this old chestnut again. When are the premier clubs and their supporters going to get over themselves and realise that they would never be competitive as professional outfits as there isn't and never will be sufficient financial backing to attract the amount of foreign mercenaries that would be required to make them so. And don't try telling me that there is enough home grown talent as that is patently not true seeing as the two current pro teams are full of the best of it and they aren't competitive.

Yes the SRU need to back down and give control up to investors but they have to stick with the district format, increasing only from two to four and not from two to 10 or 12 club teams. It just wouldn't work so get your head out of your bottom and accept that premier clubs are no longer the big fish in the Scottish rugby pond.
7

leemagee,

Perth 14/10/2008 02:35:20
The problem here is that, although much noise was made about the Edinburgh squad getting bigger, there is still not enought competition for places. Hugo Southwell must be loving life knowing that, even if he plays average rugby at 15, he will get a game at 13. Paterson, for all his goal-kicking prowess, is getting on a bit and has lost a second off his pace. We can go on about Godmam/Paterson/D.Blair competing at 10 but Paterson is not a good enough 10 (could have been if played there for the past 10 seasons!), D.Blair has never reached the heights expected of him after his Scotland Under 21's caps, and Godman has the kicking ability of a 15 year old. What's frustrating is that these guys are paid to train, paid to hit the weights, paid to practice their kicks. I hate to see Dan Parks in a Scotland jersey but at least the guy has worked on a few things and kicks well out of hand. His defense is slowly improving etc. Godman looks the same player he was when he joined from Newcastle...no improvements at all. Paterson has gone downhill in the last few seasons, De Luca is left with Hugo 'Can't Change Direction at Pace' Southwell outside him and is left to try too much just to break down defences.
The answer? A time machine. We need to go back in time and tell the SRU to spend some money keeping our best players in Scotland. Imagine a Glasgow team with Sean Lamont on one wing, Rory Lamont at fullback, Jason White at 6, and all the current players like the Evans brothers still in the squad. They could be a real force. But as soon as we unearth a real talent, the SRU sell them off to the premiership because they can't compete with the salaries. Well, a lesson in business gents, you have to spend money to make money! By spending big on players, we could make money by winning competitions and getting bigger crowds in.
Actually, what you could do is spend money on employing people in useless positions (Ian McGeechan getting employed between coaching scotland
8

leemagee,

Perth 14/10/2008 02:35:53
Cont'd
Actually, what you could do is spend money on employing people in useless positions (Ian McGeechan getting employed between coaching scotland and his post at Wasps and getting a higher salary than the players), or they could spend money on sending all the bufties to Scotland matches where they travel first class, stay in expensive hotels, get private cars and buses to the games, and feed them and give them booze.
Many will say this doesn't happen but I knew a girl who did a uni course that involved 8 weeks of working for the SRU...she was given corporate seats to all the 6 Nations games...she was just a student, helping out. Those 4 tickets she got to each game were probably worth 150 pounds each...all this adds up you know!
Anyway...rant over...can't wait to see how Scotland get on against NZ and SA, bearing in mind we have to beat one to improve our ranking for the next world cup. Given that Paterson will play on the wing even though he has lost his pace, and Parks will play at 10 even though his trademark move is the intercept pass, and Morrison will play at 13 even though he can't hold down a place at Glasgow, I am not holding my breath. Gee, guess my rant wasn't over!!!
9

GAR,

Dublin 15/10/2008 15:15:23
jesus, no 8.

I was having quite a good day at work......until I read your post.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.