Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 5th July 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Blatter argues 'all-English' final proves need for foreign quotas



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 08 May 2008
FIFA president Sepp Blatter has sparked controversy after claiming that the dominance of English clubs in the Champions League shows the need for quotas to limit the number of foreign players.
For the last two seasons there have been three English clubs in the last four of Europe's elite club competition and Blatter fears a monopolisation of football.

However, Uefa insist their flagship competition merely reflects cycles of dominance between different countries.

Blatter, who believes the richest clubs will buy up the best players from all over the world and ignore domestic talent, is to seek a mandate from the Fifa Congress later this month to begin talks with the European Union and football's authorities over implementing a 'six-plus-five' rule where a maximum of five players in a starting XI can be foreign.

Fifa will also look to extend the residency period to five years before a player can represent another country – in some countries the period is currently as short as two years.

Blatter said yesterday: "Shall we let the rich become richer and say nothing?

"The big money is coming out of the Champions League – it's the biggest league in the world and practically 80 per cent of the income goes directly to the 32 participating clubs.

"This season there were four English teams in the last eight, three in the semi-finals and two in the final.

"The Champions League has been very successful financially but it has also favoured national inequality. That's why, being in charge of football, I have to bring this item to the attention of the Congress.

"This is the sporting situation but let us start with our idea of the six-plus-five rule and then we will see what the difference will be in the future. This rule will be fighting against the monopolies of clubs and leagues.

"We are not fighting the problem of money but for the identity of national teams."

In last week's 'all-English' Champions League semi-final second leg between Chelsea and Liverpool, only seven of 28 players who took the field at Stamford Bridge were English. The previous night, Manchester United fielded just five Englishmen against Barcelona, plus a Scot – Darren Fletcher – and Welshman Ryan Giggs.

Uefa communications director William Gaillard said European football's governing body has yet to take a position on Blatter's proposal. Gaillard said: "He's entitled to his opinion. We've had this situation before. We had three Spanish clubs in the semi-finals, with two in the final. We had an all-Italian final in Manchester at Old Trafford in 2003.

"These things are bound to happen. It's football. There are foreign players in almost all the European leagues. Whether more or less is not really an issue. There's always been cycles of dominance by countries or by clubs. In the 50s it was Real Madrid and the French clubs. Then the Italians came and there was Ajax, and then Bayern Munich. That's life."

Blatter claimed his plan for the six-plus-five rule would not contravene EU labour law because it did not limit the number of foreign players a club could take on – just the number that start a match.

The EU and Uefa dispute that however, with Michel Platini, the Uefa president, saying the six-plus-five idea is a "wonderful philosophy" but unworkable under European employment laws.

The Fifa president said he would aim to have a minimum of four domestic players by 2010, five by 2011 and up to six in 2012.

In terms of the residency period, Blatter has become alarmed by the number of players – especially from Brazil – taking on foreign citizenship and then appearing for their new countries. Arsenal striker Eduardo, who plays for Croatia, is one example.

Blatter added: "After only a two-year period a player can receive nationality from another country and there is a danger that in 2014 half the players in the World Cup could come from Brazil.

"That's why the executive committee will propose to the Congress that only after five years being resident that a player can become a 'football citizen'."

The full article contains 696 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 07 May 2008 10:39 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Kiltedbhoy,

08/05/2008 07:47:09
Rather than limit the number of foreign players , what about limiting the number of teams from the big 4 countries, 2 teams each is more than enough, but hell no that would lose Uefa money and then those plush offices they have in Switzerland with free first class travel would have to be cut. Uefa like Fifa rotten to the core..................................
2

Johnny Jambo,

08/05/2008 08:49:02
With all due respect to Sepp Blatter, this is a joke is it not, there have been two teams from the same country in the final before and nothing was done then to change the rules.
Whilst I agree that there is not enough local talent coming through in British football, I think that teams have the right to sign players from wherever, Italian teams, Spanish teams, German Teams etc all have players from outwith their countries and it must be incumbent on them to break down the opposition and win the matches.
3

Who?,

08/05/2008 09:48:41
#1 the G14 clubs (worlds riches) wanted to set up their own european league. Uefa had to placate them by expanding the european cup to satisfy their cash hunger.

The rich clubs were also the prime movers behind removing the old 3 forgner rule as they wanted to buy the best the plant has to offer rather than rear indiginous talent.

#2- nobody would stop clubs from signing the best talent from europe/south america/ africa, however they would need to also produce local talent which is what clubs like arsenal just refuse to do!

I think that the blatter plan is a good idea, the focus should be on ensuring that clubs from scotland have a scottish player base, english clubs have an english base of players and the same applied to italy, germany etc.

Alot of what blatter has done is office is poor and extremley wrong not just from an ethical point of veiw but also for football as a whole. These changes do make sence and should be applied.
4

Pmonkey7,

08/05/2008 10:34:20
The big teams would still sign the best players if a quota system was in place, they would just have to keep half of them in the stand.

#3 'the focus should be on ensuring that clubs from scotland have a scottish player base, english clubs have an english base of players and the same applied to italy, germany etc'

I understand your point, but why do you think this should be the focus?
5

Johnny Jambo,

08/05/2008 11:11:56
#3 Why should Blatter want to be in a position to tell any club who they sign or who they don't, football is a business and no one tells big companies who to hire and who not, so why do it for football.
Encourage clubs to bring through local talent certainly, but don't force them.

All clubs have their academy's, Arsenal included, it just appears that the quaity is not available from the pool of local talent so why should clubs be forced to play players who are not good enough, these clubs usually loan out their younger players anyway.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.