Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Drink Driving, Don't Risk It!

Scotland play Holland on March 28 - but who will win?

Glasgow 2014 Games bid 'almost never happened'

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 29 February 2008
THE team behind the 2014 Commonwealth Games contemplated pulling out of the bidding race after London won the rights to host the Olympics, The Scotsman has learned.
More than £6 million – the majority from Glasgow City Council and the Scottish Government – was spent in the three-year drive to secure the Games, it has also emerged.

But despite jubilant scenes across Glasgow after attempts to host the event
had come to fruition, the organising team doubted the city stood a chance after London won the right to stage the 2012 Olympic Games.

Ultimately, it came to the decision that, in sporting terms, Scotland stood apart from the rest of the UK, and decided to continue with the bid.

The admission came before publication of an operational review of the city's bid. The review reveals the sum spent, which organisers claim will offer ample value for money.

With eight years to go until the Games, the organising committee is pressing ahead with implementation of its £298 million budget and hopes the event will leave a lasting legacy in terms of the nation's health and fitness.

In the summer of 2005, however, such bold initiatives were subject to grave doubts. After the International Olympic Committee awarded London the Olympics, those behind the Glasgow bid were forced to take "further consideration of the possibility of a win."

Louise Martin, former chairwoman of the Commonwealth Games Council for Scotland and honorary secretary of the Commonwealth Games Federation, explained yesterday how Glasgow 2014 might never have come about.

She said: "We had to look at it and think, 'Would that really impact against us?'

"However, we decided the Commonwealth Games was about individual countries, and we're an individual country in our own right. In Commonwealth Games terms, we were never seen as 'UK'."

Ms Martin said although London had won its bid, Glasgow's hopes rested on a different set of voters and delegates.

By August, all talk of abandoning the bid had been quelled. Now, nearly three years later, the aim is to make the Games as great a success as possible.

The operational review, published online today, aims to show the "transparency" of the process, and contains a detailed breakdown of the £6.2 million spent to November 2007.

The lion's share, £2.38 million, went on recruitment, training and advisers, with more than £530,000 spent on consultants. A further £1.72 million went on promotion, with more than £1 million on travel, and nearly £490,000 on visits from Commonwealth representatives.

Those involved continue to express confidence that, come 2014, all will be well.

Derek Casey, the organisation's interim chief executive, said: "

In 20 years, everyone will remember Glasgow not only as a great Games, but as something which changed cultural approaches to sport and health."

THE COST OF WINNING

Total expenditure for Commonwealth Games bid up to 9 November, 2007 – £6,210,000.

Funding – Glasgow City Council (£2,590,000), Scottish Government (£2,590,000), Scottish Enterprise Glasgow (£200,000) and major supporters (£830,000).

Expenditure includes:



Marketing campaigns – £290,000.

City and events branding – £150,000.

Advertising – £126,000.

Outreach, media and web – £135,000.

Candidate city file – £298,000.

Printed materials and displays – £240,000.

Inward and outward visit materials – £263,000.

DVDs and simulations – £281,000.

Attendance at Melbourne Games in 2006 – £94,000.

Outward visits to Commonwealth countries – £594,000.

Inward visits – £489,000.

Other international and domestic travel – £477,000.

Trip to Sri Lanka – £67,000.

Consultants – £532,000.

Staffing – £1,689,000.

International advisers – £162,000.





Page 1 of 1

 
1

Daibhidh,

Edinburgh 29/02/2008 11:38:32
#1 Rulesbutnotrulers

Typical pessimistic unionist bore...being a successful nation is not simply about working hard and having good schools and hospitals (which in general we do by the way - try looking at the majority of other countries in the world whose situations are significantly worse than ours), it’s about playing hard as well and lifting the nation’s spirits through sporting and cultural events.

The Commonwealth Games is hugely important to Scotland in so many ways…it’s typical that people like you cannot see the investment opportunities that will come about from this (roads, transport, sporting initiative for school to name but a few) as well as the vast amounts of money that will be poured into the Scottish economy (which, through tax, will be a benefit to us all, not just shop keepers and merchants – although given we’re shackled to London, I admit a lot of the wealth generated will be lost to the south of England – but that’s another argument).

This is a great opportunity for Scotland and one we should all rally around and support…maybe one day unionists too will be able to think out of the box and see how positive a place Scotland is, can and will be…oh, hang on, was that a pig flying by my window?!
2

Number 6,

Germany 29/02/2008 11:52:41
I am sure Glasgow will rise to the challenge and put
on a great games. We have shown time and time again
that we can organise international events to a high standard.

Whingers like #1 will be hoping it all goes wrong of course. Can't have Scotland shown in a good light now can we?
3

In the Dark,

Under a cloud 29/02/2008 12:14:06
The cost of hosting these events is negligible and, in the end, irrelevant. In a national sense the point of hosting an event like this is to encourage inward investment and development. If Glasgow, and by extension Scotland, carry this off successfully then Scotland will be seen as a great place to invest. If the benefits derived from the inward investment outweigh the cost of hosting the event, whether it goes over budget or not, then the event has been a success.
4

Kieron,

Stirling / Edinburgh 29/02/2008 13:18:39
6. Tell you what, lets spend the money on trams in Edinburgh because that will REALLY benefit Scotland and her people! Oh that's right, we're spending a helluva lot more than that on the trams which will benefit nobody!
5

P Rayner.,

London . 29/02/2008 13:40:28
I have no doubt the Glasgow Games will be well presented and successful . It is by no means certain that costs will be great . It might prove to be the case that the Games end in profit . Afterall there should be a huge increase in tourism , TV rights , advertising etc . Time will tell . But its not all about costs . Scotland is a wealthy country of the first rank which has the opportunity to show itself at its best , which I expect it to do with panache and class . Let the Glasgow Games be the best of Scotland , the London Olympics the best of Britain .
6

Clydesdale,

Lanarkshire 29/02/2008 13:45:31
6. The Games are tied in with the regeneration of a large part of Glasgow and the Games are also expected to boost both tourism and the Scottish economy. All of this above and beyond the sporting and cultural significance of the event.
7

Clydesdale,

Lanarkshire 29/02/2008 13:52:03
Look at the section on Legacy and Impact for Manchester's Commonwealth Games in the following link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2002_Commonwealth_Games

All of it appears to be very positive
8

Why can't I use my usual name?,

Glasgow 29/02/2008 14:58:57
#1+#6. Apart from the obvious point that we elect politicians to make these sorts of decisions, the Games bid was actively supported by a huge number of 'normal' people. Perhaps even more tellingly, it's usually easier to persuade people to oppose things but I'm not aware of any such movement on a significant scale. Are you?
9

Doreen,

The Cyber Shebeen 29/02/2008 15:23:16
Aye the Glasgow games....face jumping and heading the shot...catching the javelin and neckin the maist pies....

With apologies to Vivian Stanshall..
10

Southsider71,

East Ren, Glasgow 29/02/2008 17:00:21
#13, I thought you would have spontaneously combusted had you set foot in george square...
11

Southsider71,

East Ren, Glasgow 29/02/2008 17:01:55
#12 "neckin the maist pies...." scotch pies = disgusting grey meat, yuk!
12

Jock Tamson,

Scotland, Caledonia, Albva 29/02/2008 22:51:23
If I ever thought that anything to do with the money which gets poured into Glasgow would have any benefit to the rest of Scotland then I would be in favour of the Commonwealth Games per se.

However history tells me that this will be an expensive excuse for Glasgow to blow its trumpet until the real cost comes home to roost.
13

Southsider71,

East Ren, Glasgow 01/03/2008 12:10:06
#16 Dont attend the games then...

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.