Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 10th May 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

New coach needed now after sombre Saturday



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 24 March 2008
THE mood was sombre as we trudged away from Tynecastle after Saturday's depressing no score draw against Falkirk.
Fans had turned up once again in good numbers to give our team the benefit of the "twelfth man" a large home support can provide, in a crucial match.

In doing so we denied Falkirk the extra seats they had requested. And there are many other compet
ing ways to spend an Easter Saturday afternoon.

But Hearts fans are among the most loyal not just in Scotland but the whole UK. We turn up in rain, sleet or snow and the freezing conditions of Saturday because our club has a long, fine and honourable tradition.

A tradition which was again underlined when 300 turned up on Saturday night for the Willie Bauld Memorial Dinner.

Pilmar Smith, in his toast to "the king" exemplified the deep respect so many fans have for our club, its heroes and its history.

But, as I left the Wheatfield Stand earlier in the day, there was no doubt some felt their loyalty was being stretched to breaking point.

Writing this column means that fans are not shy to let me know their views. It is clear that the undoubted affection for Stevie Frail is being strained.

There is a recognition that he has been thrust into a position of responsibility and an impossible position not of his making. But any benefit of the doubt began to evaporate as we saw the lack of urgency in players and total absence of any strategy from the dugout.

Falkirk manager Yogi Hughes clearly knew what he wanted and achieved the necessary draw away from home to maintain their advantage in the SPL.

We thus now need to speed up the search for a permanent managerial appointment.

As recently as last week I was among those who was prepared to accept a deadline of June for the New Year promise to be fulfilled. Now it is clear that it must be done sooner.

If we are to get off to a flying start next season we need to get a new coach in as soon as possible. He will need some time to get the right squad in place, plan the pre-season and get them working together as a team.

If we do not move soon, some potential managers could be snapped up elsewhere.

Why does it need to have taken so long already? I can't believe that if we make the right offer to the right man he wouldn't come straight away.

All the sentimental talk about commitments to other clubs is not something I recall from my time in the boardroom.

As well as having my ears bent with the views of fans on Saturday, I took a straw poll on the basis of three possible choices. They are the obvious ones of Jim Jefferies, Mark McGhee and Craig Levein.

There was overwhelming support for Levein. Having attended the CIS Cup Final and seen the way he set out his stall there I must agree.

And, on the day of our depressing draw, he recorded yet another victory. Craig may be proud, have strong views and a high opinion of his own ability but all this is justified and he has an affection for Hearts.

As I have said before I have reasons to believe, if he is given the right offer with an assurance he will have the full powers of a UK-style manager, he would accept.

It is rumoured that Campbell Ogilvie also backs Levein. If this is so and if his appointment as Managing Director really does give him more responsibility he should now start exercising it.

With the season tickets now being put on sale the appointment of Levein as manager would also give a boost to sales.

Next week we face the prospect of Levein in the away dugout as we limp towards the lower half of the SPL and finishing in the bottom six for the first time since the split came into existence. There could be no better time to make a bold move which would give a real boost to those who left the ground in deep gloom on Saturday.

Final decision sparks debate on use of technology in football
AT THE time I thought Dundee United were denied a cast iron penalty in the CIS Cup Final.

Television evidence confirms emphatically what we thought on the day. It also once again raises the question of why, in this 21st Century, where technological advances have revolutionised other sports, in football we remain firmly in the 20th Century. Technology is now available which would enable the fourth official to watch TV screens giving views of every angle of play.

If there was any doubt the referee could almost instantaneously consult the fourth official on fouls, offsides and penalties.

This would avoid having to admit afterwards a mistake had been made which could have cost a club dear.

I understand also the technology which determines whether the ball is out at tennis could be used to confirm if the football was over the line, particularly the goalline. When will the SFA start to move with the times on this and other potential changes? For instance, when a player is injured why is it his team which suffers the loss of a player while he goes off the park and sometimes waits many minutes to be called on?

After all it is his opponents who have committed the foul yet his team has to play with one man down.

And then there is the idea of introducing 'sin-bins' for fouls so the offender's team has to play one short for a period of, say, ten minutes, as a more appropriate punishment than the yellow card.







The full article contains 970 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 24 March 2008 10:51 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Heart of Midlothian FC
 
1

just a jambo,

24/03/2008 11:56:30
one man up front was a disgrace,elliot was poor but dont think anyone could have done better with the service he got. stewart needs a boot up the back side because he can and should be doing better.
2

SAME RULES APPLY !!!,

24/03/2008 12:31:46
Not a bad article but Foulkes keeps misusing the word "we" whe talking about decisions of the Hearts heirarcy.
This is quite misleading, I thought he had quit the board ages ago after spittin the dummy out.
3

victorian,

24/03/2008 12:38:13
#2, he isn't using the word 'we' in the context you are implying, he's using it in the context that football supporters always do, ie assimilating himself into the club as a whole.

example - i hope we win next week.

4

SAME RULES APPLY !!!,

24/03/2008 12:45:29
Ah the delusion of belonging, now I get it.

We sold Velicka.

We ran up record debt.

5

GOA-JAMBO,

Back Hame 24/03/2008 12:48:13
I do think the majority of Hearts fans want Levein back, he was part of Chris Robinson`s trio Pressley included who said the only way ahead was for the Heart of Midlothian was to move to Murrayfield, I will never forgive him for that.
6

scorchio,

West of the Pecos 24/03/2008 12:59:55
Let's have some straight talking, not this political mamby pamby guff.
Hearts were dire on Saturday. The team treated the game as if it were meaningless, and Shaggy is just picking up a salary for as long as he can.
He tries to hard to please Romanov by his selections and some of the players by saying stuff like ...Elliots' confidence is low".
Big Yogi had us sussed, and we were once again leaderless on and off the park.
As for Victors "I hope we can win on Saturday" caviat... Not with that eleven we wont Vic.
7

JTLifer,

24/03/2008 13:01:15
We all know why the team/club is in a complete mess and it's nothing to do with Frail.
I can't believe he (Foulkes) is talking about credible managers for Hearts. No decent manager is going to put his reputation on the line to join a circus...get real!
To cure the patient you need to remove the disease and unfortunately this doesn't appear to be an option.
8

scorchio,

West of the Pecos 24/03/2008 13:10:13
#7 Ultimately you can say the buck stops with Vlad, but in all walks of life there is a thing called personal accountability!
Frail is not up to it, and as someone who is convinced of that, I will continue to criticise him and a good few players at the club, who are gash.

9

TommyTommy,

24/03/2008 13:50:34
I agree with you 7
Romanov has created a shambles .
He has made a proud club a laughing stock.
Court cases,a good respected manager sacked.A respected club captain humiliated and chased out of Tynecastle,money missing , and dross on the park representing HOM.

Meanwhile inaction prevails.
10

SAME RULES APPLY !!!,

24/03/2008 13:58:20
#5
Forgive him or not, was there not some basis to what was said at the time? Huge unmanagable debt and the banks closing in.
Sure Hearts are still at Tynecastle, but for how long? Levein ect may have muted a move, but in the way that Lord Foulkes heralded the entrance of Vlad, hard times mean you have to take any course of action open to you.

You may yet wish you were at murrayfield is what I'm saying. As for Levein, can't see him wanting the grief.
11

GOA-JAMBO,

Back Hame 24/03/2008 15:44:09
#10 To sell the ground where we have been for over 100 years was unthinkable given that Chris Robinson said there was no other option, there was another option and thanks to Vlad he proved him wrong, as for Levein and Pressley they unlike Gary McKay and John Robertson had no feelings for our club so they just went along with CR.
Time will tell if we should have moved to Murrayfield. If the new stand goes ahead then we will be at Tynecastle for another 100 years, I hope that a new manager is in place soon and new players will come in when he takes his post .
12

SAME RULES APPLY !!!,

24/03/2008 23:50:48
Craig's probably got as much feeling for the club as you lot had for him. A good servant who's career was cut short by knee ligament damage.
Could the Jambos be bothered to turn up at his testimonial, not a chance, aw to busy that night.
SAME RULES APPLY !!!
13

blackhall,

edinburgh 25/03/2008 07:25:22
Lord Foulkes shows exactly the same pompous arrogance when talking about Hearts as he does in his political career. Why would Craig Levein even consider taking on the manager's role at Tynecastle ? At the moment he has an excellent side at Dundee United who can only get better. He has European football likely for next season. He is allowed to make his own decisions on team selection and he has money available to buy players. Yet Lord Foulkes seems to just presume that Levein would be be falling over himself to take a job with a bottom six team with no prospect of European football, a mad owner who wont let the manager select the team and a high possibility of going bust over its £40 million debt. As Foulkes pontificates from his high ground, he uses his political two faces to casually forget that he introduced Romanov and persuaded Hearts shareholders that Vlad was our saviour. If George had any scruples he would sit in the corner squirming with shame and embarassment. With George lending his political leadership and judgement to the problem one can only presume that Hearts will head into the same oblivion as Scottish Labour.
14

Bleeding Heart...,

25/03/2008 22:41:01
#13 Interesting weave between politics and football!

Why do so many people feel the need to bring Foulkes' politics into their comments on his articles about HMFC?

I suspect Foulkes still has "sources" on the inside at Tynecastle and as such, when he suggests that someone like Levein might be a candidate for the Hearts job, I've a hunch that he does so because he knows more than most of us do about the situation.

As to Foulkes' role in ushering-in Romanov, don't you agree that it's very easy to be wise with hindsight?

In the context of what was going on at the time, who could have foreseen how things would turn out?

In the aftermath of his resignation (in protest at Anderton's sacking) Foulkes stated that Romanov was "acting like a megalomaniac".

Foulkes also stated that "Romanov is behaving like a dictator and if he continues there will be a revolution against him. I brought him in and very much regret that now."

So Foulkes knows full well that Romanov is a menace and regrets his initial support for him.

I can't see that it's reasonable to pillory Foulkes ad infinitum because he misjudged Romanov - unless of course, one has another agenda for doing so.

The only question now for Hearts fans is how to unite round an effective response to Romanov's disinformation and mismanagement.
15

SAME RULES APPLY !!!,

26/03/2008 00:44:59
Bleeding Heart,

You been on the gullible pills again.

Foulkes has "sources". Come on brother Bleeding Heart get a grip.

Even when Foulkes was at hearts he didn't have a clue what was going on, Burley, Anderton ect. What do you honestly think may have changed?
It really doesn't matter what is going on "inside Tynecastle", big decisions are obviously made elsewhere, the process is unilateral and done on a need to know basis.

As for Levein, surely now with the re-introduction of Burley to the Scottish game, the two men will have a working relationship. If an approach was made then chances are they might have a wee quiet conversation about working for Romanov. That in itself would be enough to put the lad off. Eddie Thomson seems a genuine nice guy and there are no doubt plenty of English Championship clubs watching United's progress. In short Levein has options, so why would he want to go down the Frail, Rix route of having to lie to the media, take the fans flak and generally be seen as a puppet.

Can't see it happening.

"Someone like Levein" now that is a different matter. That could mean anything eg human male. Maybe even you Brother Bleeding Heart? You could be a wee stalking horse my friend.

SAME RULES APPLY !!!

16

Bleeding Heart...,

26/03/2008 20:01:03
#15 Ah! I didn't think you could resist a bite when someone dares to suggest that Foulkes is not the Satanic One.

"Gullible pills"? Perhaps. Clearly, you're still over-dosing on the Cynical Pills.

Look, what have I said that's so extravagant? I've suggested that, in my opinion, Foulkes still has contact with people inside Tynecastle. He is after all, a friend of Charlie Mann - or do you dispute this?

Your response is typically dogmatic: "Even when Foulkes was at hearts he didn't have a clue what was going on".

Really? That's a bold assertion. Do you have any evidence to substantiate your claim? Any factual examples to regale us with? Mmm...perhaps not, then.

And let's not forget - I only ventured an opinion. I am entitled to one, am I not?

Yes, like #13 you're correct, for the reasons you've both given, in suggesting that bringing Levein to Tynecastle would be fraught with difficulties.

But I didn't suggest otherwise, did I? I WOULD suggest however, that it's not impossible that Levein could return to Hearts.

Foulkes is not given to sensationalist language in his football commentaries.

What does Foulkes say about Levein? He says:

"I have said before I have reasons to believe, if he (Levein) is given the right offer with an assurance he will have the full powers of a UK-style manager, he would accept".

So, Foulkes isn't saying that an approach has been, or will be, made. He's saying, on the basis of information he has been privy to, that if the right offer was made, HE believes Levein would take it seriously and probably accept.

Foulkes' opinion. He's entitled to hold it.
17

SAME RULES APPLY !!!,

26/03/2008 23:58:14
Charlie Mann is a goat.

Romanov wears the troosers in that hoose.

Plus his "assurance" isn't worth the paper it is written on. We all know that and Levein is not a daft laddie.

I don't think Foulkes is the satanic one (post 10) just a bit of a radge like you Brother Bleeding Heart. No harm in that. I even concede to traits of radgeness myself on occassion.

SAME RULES APPLY !!!
18

Bleeding Heart...,

27/03/2008 07:30:03
#17 - You have an irritating tendency to ignore points put to you and to introduce new, and even redder, herrings.

I don't think there's any doubt that Romanov is in charge - that's surely not in dispute - but are you saying that Charlie Mann isn't privy to what goes on indoors at Tynecastle?

That was my earlier point in case you missed it.

This despite Mann being a "goat" - care to provide an example to substantiate this comment?

I simply stated the fact that Foulkes, quite reasonably, is merely suggesting there would have to be such an assurance for Levein to consider taking the Hearts job.

Having conveniently ignored this point in your earlier post, you now decide to suggest that Romanov's assurance would be worthless anyway.

Maybe - I would also be wary of an "assurance" from Romanov - but I'm sure Levein is sensible enough to judge the matter competently himself, don't you think?

But why are you only commenting on Foulkes' mention of an "assurance" now?

Did you fail to read the article first time round?
19

SAME RULES APPLY !!!,

27/03/2008 11:48:23
"I simply stated the fact that Foulkes, quite reasonably, is merely suggesting there would have to be such an assurance for Levein to consider taking the Hearts job."

In reply I would like to reasonably state the fact that if my auntie had baws she'd be my uncle.

I simply state the fact that I am merely suggesting that in my opinion, Mann is a goat.

Brother Bleeds, you are confusing me now.

SAME RULES APPLY !!!


20

Laughing at The Jambos,

29/03/2008 19:27:44
#18 BLOATED F4RT

You really ARE easily irritated aren't you, Muchacho?
Oh Goodie !!!
21

Laughing at The Jambos,

29/03/2008 19:28:55
#9 TOMMY TOMMY

Nice one Sir.....keep tellin' them !!

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Would the new Hearts stadium plan lead to overcrowding problems?
Yes, emergency vehicles would struggle to get in.
Yes, but these could be fixed by banning cars on match days.
No, there’s still plenty of space left for more fans.

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.