Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Kilmarnock 0 - 2 Dundee United: United's smash-and-grab raid

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 08 November 2009
Casalinuovo 21 (pen), 56
AT THE start of the season this would have been described as daylight robbery, but at this time of the year it constitutes a smash-and-grab in the gloaming by a Dundee United side that was comprehensively outplayed for large parts of this encounter b
y a Kilmarnock side which did everything but put the ball in the net, thanks in large part to a trio of outstanding saves from Nicky Weaver.

Unfortunately for the Ayrshire men, that rather crucial part of the equation was about all that their deceptively limited visitors offered, and even then they had to rely on the combination of Jennison Myrie-Williams' virtuosity and some eccentric refereeing from Stevie O'Reilly to break the deadlock.

"That was by far the best performance of the season where we've got nothing," said Killie manager Jim Jefferies afterwards. "In open play we were fantastic, especially in the first half, and were ten times better than when we beat St Johnstone. But all of that counts for nothing if you can't put the ball in the goal."

If Dundee United flattered to deceive, then the artisans of Kilmarnock can have few complaints about the outcome because they had plenty enough possession and chances to have won this game with ease. They set off with real purpose and if the opening exchanges were full of errors and stray passes, they were also characterised by a directness and endeavour from Killie that almost paid dividends when they were twice denied penalties within the opening ten minutes. The first came when Kevin Kyle looked all set to ram the ball home from close range only to be barged off the ball, the second came moments later when David Fernandez was pushed to the ground even more obviously, only for the player to be adjudged offside.

Within five minutes Kyle muscled his way on to a speculative punt forwards and went close in a move in which Jamie Hamill was bowled over in the box and could conceivably have won a penalty. Actually, it's fair to say that O'Reilly was having a bit of a nightmare, and when he missed a handball in the United box and then brought an apoplectic Fernandez back for a United foul when the Spaniard had a clear run on goal, the stand almost erupted.

On 20 minutes it was confirmed that the good burghers of Kilmarnock won't be offering Mr O'Reilly the freedom of the town any time soon when he awarded United the softest of penalties as Myrie-Williams went down like a sack of spuds at the softest of touches from Garry Hay. Damian Casalinuovo's penalty wasn't great but still had enough to squirt under Killie keeper Mark Brown.

With the home side avoiding the resolute Andy Webster by working the left wing relentlessly, with Mehdi Taouil, Fernandez and Hay combining time after time to provide Kyle with a constant flow of ball, the best of the chances were all coming Killie's way, with Fernandez heading wide of an open goal shortly after United's opener, while Gavin Skelton was even more culpable moments later when he hoiked the ball into row Z from close range.

If Dundee United weaved some pretty patterns, their almost total lack of shots on goal was telling. Only a long-range shot from Morgaro Gomis shortly before half-time forced Brown into action.

United had Weaver to thank for their half-time lead, with the keeper saving magnificently from Kyle after Fernandez got behind Webster and headed the ball down to the big striker, whose decision to use power rather than precision meant Killie's best chance of the half went begging. Hay almost made amends when the ball broke to him, but his shot across goal missed the back post by inches. Kyle's opposite number endured the same frustration as Kyle when Brown's near-post save denied Casalinuovo, but it was Killie who were making all the running.

Yet just as Killie looked likely to get back on level terms, United scored another completely against the run of play. This time it was David Goodwillie who made the initial break, feeding Myrie-Williams on the right. The Englishman's run took him deep into the Killie penalty box and as Brown came out to meet him he poked the ball across goal for Casalinuovo to knock it in.

Killie pressed until the last, even though it left them increasingly open to United counter attacks, but it looked like it wasn't fated to be.

MAN OF THE MATCH

Jennison Myrie-Williams made both of Dundee United's goals, first by winning a penalty and then by laying the goal on a plate to Casalinuovo.

QUICK FACT

Dundee United are called the Arabs because the liberal use of sand to make Tannadice playable for their Cup tie against Albion Rovers during the Big Freeze of 1962/3 made the pitch look like the Sahara.

TALKING POINT

The first goal. Garry Hay said he didn't touch Jennison Myrie-Williams and Jim Jefferies said that he thought "the lad played for it, that there was no contact".





Page 1 of 1

 
1

,

08/11/2009 02:30:42
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
2

WGWYA,

WA 08/11/2009 03:45:15
What game were you at?

This is the worst report I've read on a game for a long time.
3

James,

Dundee 08/11/2009 09:07:15
Stick to being a food critic Bath.

You're limitations as both an observer and reporter are obvious.

Did Jefferies steal your half time peh?



Well done United. With some key players still to return and the new goalie Dusan Pernis joining soon, should be interesting to see if we can go the distance this year.
4

SMELLARAT,

Brighton 08/11/2009 09:40:15
Where's the sense of balance in this report? I expect better from the Scotsman.

The statistics of the game tell you that this is just a biased piece of nonsense. Check soccernet. Having seen the penalty - it was a stone-waller.

Kilmarnock had a few chances but goalkeeping has always been part of football. The fact that Weaver played brilliantly should be viewed as a plus for United's performance rather than somehow cheating the home team. As well as the ridiculously one sided view of the match, why are there no quotes from the victors? This could have been written by Jefferies himself.

I suggest you recruit a more neutral reporter for Kilmarnock games.
5

GMCD,

08/11/2009 10:12:15
NIce to see some other team get some dodgy refereeing decisions...Utd have had their share already this year!!!

Utd went away - scored two good goals and defended well with some heroics from the keeper....that is life... #1 well said
6

ARAB STU,

GLASGOW 08/11/2009 11:03:22
Usually I wouldn't waste my time commenting on football reports, but this one is laughable. Is this guy actually getting paid for this nonsense? The first goal was against the run of play but it was a stonewall penalty. Thereafter BOTH sides had great chances, and BOTH goalkeepers played superbly. By saying that the second goal was against the run of play Mr Bath simply reveals the fact he was still in the pie queue at the start of the second period.

Clearly he had his headline written on 30 minutes, and when the subsequent facts didn't fit his story, he just changed the facts. More shots on target, more shots off target, more possession and three times as many corners (BBC) - yet apparently United were rubbish!
7

KillieTommy,

Kilmarnock 08/11/2009 11:17:10
Ref was "not very good", linesman was worse. Still doesn't get away from the fact Killie missed a load of good chances. Well done to United, it was actually not a bad game and I never went away totally despondent.
8

,

08/11/2009 11:23:07
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
9

Woospot,

Dundee 08/11/2009 12:26:09
Number 8 - this about United and Killie, not Rangers so kindly toddle off somewhere else.

As for the article, what a lot of nonsense. He says that "when he awarded United the softest of penalties as Myrie-Williams went down like a sack of spuds at the softest of touches from Garry Hay.". I was at the game and have seen it again online. Myrie Williams knocked the ball past Hay, who then stuck his foot out.

A) It was not a soft penalty, and B) Of course Myrie Williams went down. He was tripped. There is not a forward in the league who wouldn't have gone down. Sack of spuds indeed.

"If Dundee United flattered to deceive, then the artisans of Kilmarnock can have few complaints "
"
Within five minutes Kyle muscled his way on to a speculative punt forwards"

Artisans eh?
10

spiritof barcelona,

08/11/2009 12:38:15
I'm waiting for some Kilmarnock fans to come along and defend this biased drivel. Young on Radio Scotland who exhibits this anti United (and anti City of Dundee)attitude as well is another one.
11

GMCD,

08/11/2009 14:49:21
Utd did the business - how any KIllie fan can accuse a Utd player of diving when they play Taouil!!!!
12

Dr Arab,

Arabia 08/11/2009 15:16:48
what is Diok Bath on ?
whats with this biased and factually incorrect report ?
oi Dick
heres the stats from your own "paper"
Possesion Killi 45% Utd 55%
Shots on target Killi 6 Utd 10
Shots off target Killi 6 Utd 6
Corners Killi 3 Utd 10
doesn't look much like a one sided game from that does it ?
eejit
13

,

08/11/2009 15:42:53
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
14

ArabM,

Edinburgh 08/11/2009 17:04:58
Have to agree with the above. Look at the stats, this journo doesn't know what he's talking about. what an embarrasssing piece of one sided reporting.
15

SOFBTRC,

Far, far from Glasgow 08/11/2009 21:14:59
Mr. Bath,

Why did you delete my post, #13?

As far as I can see, it broke NONE of your newspaper's guidelines on posted comments. What it did say was that your article, above, is laughable in terms of its relation to what actually happened at the game.

If that's why you're now deleting comments, then it's a sad day for free speech. What I said was true, and it was deleted. Your article borders on the farcical, yet it's still there.

Pathetic.
16

SOFBTRC,

Far, far from Glasgow 08/11/2009 21:15:58
Mr. Bath,

I see that James from Dundee (#3) points out that you're normally a food critic.

Are you a specialist in mince?
17

Woospot,

Dundee 08/11/2009 23:04:51
This article is now the talk of various messageboards. No-one objects to criticism of United, but a tiny bit of balance please.

I wonder, is Mr Bath a Kilmarnock fan or have DUFC done something to upset him. I think any Killie or United fan at the game will confirm it was a game in which BOTH teams played well and created loads of chances.

If Mr Bath can't write a neutral, unbiased report then maybe football isn't the sport for him.
18

kt,

09/11/2009 05:35:58
Have to day that I read post number 1 before it was deleted....no idea why it was deleted for pointing out statistical facts re the goal attempts....this report and the corresponding one in the scotsman are really a joke and the paper should really have a word with whoever is hired to write them....
19

SOFBTRC,

Far, far from Glasgow 09/11/2009 15:26:51
I see I've now had an even more innocuous post (#1) deleted from the Scotsman story on this game (Monday's paper). My comments there broke no rules as far as I can see. No swearing, no abuse of anyone. Just an opinion that the reporting on this particular game has been wildly inaccurate. It seems that we're not now allowed to express a valid opinion without being censored.

There's a link to the Press Complaints Commission at the bottom of this page. I'm sure they wouldn't view censorship too kindly.
20

SOFBTRC,

Far, far from Glasgow 09/11/2009 18:09:47
Seems that a supposed United supporter who posts here under the name "Stoobing" has been complaining about my posts. The guy is one of the resident ****s on the eastfootball forum and seems to have some long-standing disagreement with me. I think it's maybe because he's based in London and attends very few United matches, but he doesn't like me pointing out to him that he's too tight to make even the smallest financial contribution to the club, such as a donation to "United for Kids". Won't even spare a tenner a year for the club he "supports". So he complains about my posts behind the scenes but won't actually show his face here and admit to what he's doing because he's a coward.

Tell you what, Scotsman - rather than just automatically deleting every post that "Stoobing" complains about, why don't you actually read the post and then point out to "Stoobing" that there's nothing in the post that breaks your posting rules? Better still, tell him that you'll ban him if he keeps wasting your time with his childish behaviour and complaints.

Expect this to be deleted within the hour.
21

SOFBTRC,

Far, far from Glasgow 09/11/2009 18:48:56
Here's a previous report from Mr. Bath, on St. Mirren vs United from earlier in the season.

Seems like we're not imagining it that he is incapable of commenting objectively on a United match:

http://scotlandonsunday.scotsman.com/stmirrenfc/St-Mirren-0--0.5579721.jp

I see that "Stoobing the Stalker" also showed his face in that thread.
22

Jed Zeppelin,

Dundee 10/11/2009 11:53:15
Joke Reporter. Joke Report.

I expect nothing more from the SOS these days.

Objectivity and Unbiased Reporting are the watch words of this rag.
23

Darth Arab,

Dundee 17/11/2009 14:45:33
I don't know where this bloke is getting the 'soft penalty' thing from, I don't think I have ever seen such a blatant penalty. Myrie-Williams is a cheat though, do not doubt that, his diving exploits against Dundee in the friendly have got all their players wanting to kick lumps out of him next season, which is fair enough.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Web Links:

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.