Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Monday, 8th September 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Squash courts will go warn protesters



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

SAVE Meadowbank campaigners warn that the squash courts at the city's sports facility will be lost when the current centre is demolished.
They claim thousands of people will disagree with the city council's plans not to include squash courts in the new "mini-Meadowbank".

Save Meadowbank spokesman Kevin Connor said: "Squash is not part of the council's plan for mini-Meadowbank.

"It's one of many sports the council has decided not to provide. Thousands of people disagree with this council vision.

"We call on the council to listen to what their citizens are telling them and retain the entire Meadowbank site for sports use."

Mark Wishart, who has been playing squash for two decades says there are not enough courts at the centre as it is.

He added: "When I asked what other council courts are available I was directed to Craiglockhart.

"But they told me their courts are now closed and are expected to remain so for at least a year.

"Two squash courts for a city the size of Edinburgh is simply ridiculous."

The Save Meadowbank campaign, which was formed in March last year, was set up to oppose plans to demolish the current stadium and sell off land to private developers.





The full article contains 210 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 15 July 2008 10:03 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Meadowbank
 
1

gus1940,

Edinburgh 15/07/2008 12:54:13
We seemm to have a council whose main policy is to totally ignore the wishes of the citizens of the city in particular as regards, trams, roads, sports fascilities, property developments and so on and on and on.
2

Gastric Antral Vascular Ectasia,

15/07/2008 13:58:18
"Squash courts will go warn protesters"?

The squash courts are going to warn the protesters?



3

I C Weiner,

the real world 15/07/2008 16:58:35
gus1940 - you should open your mind a bit.

Any development will have its detractors and they're usually very vocal. I bet you that if you walked the streets and asked 100 people if they thought trams will be good most would say yes. Some may reserve opinion but I guarantee that although people are complaining now, trams will be popular when the system is up and running.
90,000 people use them every day in Dublin and the usage is increasing at a rate 3.5 million every year. When they were being build there was uproar - just like here.

Stop moaning.
4

gus1940,

Edinburgh 15/07/2008 20:04:10
#3

I have spoken to well over 100 people and asked them about the trams - not one was in favour.

Don't forget - democracy is about carrying out the wishes of the people not trampling over popular opinion and common sense.
5

Julian.,

edinburgh 15/07/2008 23:21:07
#4 Gus,

You must have been speaking to a pretty skewed sample if you found 100% against.

Even if you're right; if trams are such a big issue and 100% were against it, they've really only got themselves to blame for voting for pro-tram parties. It's not rocket science. If you wanted to stop the trams last year, should have voted SNP.
6

Old Cartha Boy,

16/07/2008 09:16:33
#5 from Julian

Many of us did vote SNP given their position on trams last year - and the outcome is obvious! Trams were also to be funded by the congestion charge - that was rejected but the trams remain through the back door!
7

Julian.,

edinburgh 16/07/2008 16:34:20
#6 Old Cartha,

Not quite sure how we got on to trams. Yes, the outcome is obvious...27% voted SNP and we got trams. So much for this mythical 100% who were against them. Which is also very strange considering I've met several people in favour (maybe they were aliens).

As for the congestion charge...sorry but you're wrong. The congestion charge was only going to pay for line 3, not the other 2.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.