Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

The hunt is On.
Sponsored by
Can you track down Scotland's wildest beastie?
 
 
Wednesday, 3rd December 2008

Haggis Hunt is now on!

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Two suspended after Couper was left needing plastic surgery



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 04 April 2008
TWO Melrose rugby forwards have been suspended for dangerous play after incidents during a Scottish Cup match against Boroughmuir.
Muir's Rory Couper needed surgery on an ear injury after the game on March 15, which the Meggetland side lost 16-0.

A Scottish Rugby disciplinary panel has banned Kieran Cooney and John Dalziel for six and three weeks respectively after they w
ere cited by Boroughmuir. A statement says Cooney had "deliberately stamped on the head" of Couper.

It adds that Dalziel was found guilty of "reckless use of the boot", also against Couper.

However, the disciplinary panel stated it could not find that the injury sustained by Couper was as a result of being stood on by either player – who still have the right of appeal.

Couper today stressed that he was keen to put the incident behind him, while recognising Boroughmuir had a right to take steps to try to ensure foul play does not go unpunished.

"I did not set out to get any player suspended but the club clearly decided there was a case to answer from watching a video, which I didn't see until afterwards.

"Boroughmuir wanted to make the point that you don't put boots on anybody's head.

"It isn't up to me to decide whether the length of suspensions are appropriate and it might have been that a third pair of boots was involved other than those belonging to the two players who have been suspended.

"All I did was tackle somebody then I had to leave the field."

Ironically, 27-year-old Couper's comeback from his injury sustained could be at Melrose when Boroughmuir contest their annual sevens tournament next week.

"My ear is still a bit tender and two-and-a-half weeks with no running certainly makes a dent in your fitness so I'm struggling to play in the Haddington sevens tomorrow," said the winger.

"But Melrose Sevens is a prestigious event and I'm keen to try to make myself available."

After initially being taken from the Greenyards pitch Couper was transferred to St John's Hospital, Livingston, where there is a plastic surgery unit.

He was released on Saturday night with pain-killers then returned the following day for an operation.





The full article contains 379 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 04 April 2008 2:17 PM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

TonyB,

04/04/2008 14:25:08
So, if the shoeing didn't rip his ear to bits, what did?
6 weeks for that kind of damage yet people get longer for swearing. Good message to the kids wanting to play the game.
2

SKEEDLE,

Hawick 04/04/2008 20:06:30
They're not getting to play against Hawick Mr Sports Insider No2.
3

Fat one,

Edinburgh 04/04/2008 20:13:50
rucking of heads, regardless of who they or the victims are, they should be banned for at least 6 months, an absolute disgrace that they ended one mans season yet they get to start next years!!
4

Border Man,

Hawick 05/04/2008 09:40:42
Yet another assasination of borders Players I see one of wich has been a great servent to Borders rugby with an emaculate disciplinery record, sounds like both players were victim of mistaken identity when it was a third boot that caused his injury and the mentioned pair were only rucking faitly under the watchfull eye of the referee???? Anything to ruin a border clubs chance at the Cup though.
5

SKEEDLE,

Hawick 05/04/2008 11:34:25
Sports insider, I see you were right. I did think Jamie Murray wasn't letting to much out last night on Radio Borders. Nae doot Creamy would have advised them on what to do. Nae worries ony way.
6

Manic Maroon,

05/04/2008 17:30:52
There is no more disgusting or cowardly act of foul play on a rugby pitch than the use of boot on head at a ruck, and there should be no appeal allowed in these circumstances.

Whilst you can't blame Melrose too much for using the rules to their advantage they would have gained more respect from other Clubs, players and spectators if they had sucked it up and told their players to accept their punishment.

Having just returned from seeing Hawick get beat, Dalziel was an important part of the Melrose win, particularly his playing of the ref with continual offsides etc. No doubt they will now be asking for the appeal decision to be delayed until after at least the semi-final.
7

Border Man,

Hawick 05/04/2008 21:41:37
Manic Maroon??? Nice message a borderer and a So called Gala Man. Sounds like sour grapes JD is not still playing for you. I take it your not really from Gala, as even myself as a Hawick man knows JD would not deliberately stamp on anyonne. Heard there was a Gala Man cited the other week though didny hear you commenting on that wise guy!
8

Borders-will-always-be-best,

Hawick 06/04/2008 10:22:31
At the end of the day the two guys in question were found guilty and were given a six and three week ban. In what way is the system right that these guys can play in a scottish cup quarter final. Where is the justice in that? I think that the SRU are really need to review their disciplinary regulations. This appeal process should not allow the players to play, this has created nothing but a loophole in the law. So what justice is there when these guys go to their appeal and again are found guilty? I know i will be accused of sour grapes because i am from Hawick but at the end of the day i would feel the exact same way if it was Hawick players in question. You never hear of a convicted murderer that appeals his convictions being released until he goes before the appeal panel, so why is it any different here.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.