Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Ban rules Hines out of Test

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 25 June 2009
A FORGETTABLE tour for Scotland's Lions worsened in South Africa yesterday when Nathan Hines became the first of the British and Irish squad to be banned after he was cited for a dangerous 'spear' tackle in the 13-13 draw against the Emerging Springboks at Newlands on Tuesday.
Hines was suspended for one week for an illegal tackle on Wilhelm Steenkamp after attending a disciplinary hearing in Cape Town, but the Lions management are believed to feel the punishment is unwarranted and may exercise their right to appeal the ban within 24 hours. If no challenge to the verdict is made this morning, or an appeal is unsuccessful, it means Hines will be ruled out of Saturday's second Test against South Africa in Pretoria, although the 32-year-old lock would still be free to play in the series finale in Johannesburg a week later.

Although Hines was not selected for the first Test, he had appeared to be Scotland's only realistic hope of making the squad for the second match of the series. Edinburgh hooker Ross Ford failed to make any significant impact in the shadow team and scrum-half Mike Blair was the only substitute left on the bench on Tuesday.

Prop Euan Murray, tipped to play a key role in South Africa before the ten-match campaign began, limped out of the tour after he sprained an ankle during the Lions' 20-8 victory over the Southern Kings in Port Elizabeth the Tuesday in the midweek before the first Test. The tourists lost that match 26-21 in Durban and Murray's enforced absence was bemoaned as the Lions were dominated in the scrum by the Springboks.

Hines, who harboured hopes of at least a place on the bench this weekend, and Murray were the only two Scots named in the initial British and Irish Lions squad, before Ford and Blair were handed late call-ups to replace Jerry Flannery and Tomas O'Leary respectively. The minimal Scots presence in the Lions touring party was criticised as a damning reflection on the international side's current standing, although Scotland A's success in the IRB Nations Cup last weekend and the beginning of a new era under Andy Robinson has since provided optimism for next season.

However, if 58-times capped Hines remains excluded from this weekend's Lions action, it will be another bitter disappointment for Scottish rugby.

The forward was cited for a dangerous tackle on Emerging Springboks' lock Steenkamp, and was represented at his hearing by Richard Smith QC. Lions manager Gerald Davies and head coach Ian McGeechan were also present at the hearing, held at Western Province Rugby Union in Newlands.

Judicial officer Alan Hudson, of Canada, found the Perpignan lock to be in breach of law 10.4 – lifting his opponent above the perpendicular and dropping him to the ground – after he was reported by New Zealand citing commissioner Steve Hinds.

The official complaint is a result of an incident in the ninth minute. Steenkamp was not injured in the tackle, but the pair clashed again in the 48th minute when Steenkamp took a short pass from Jano Vermaak and was lifted by Hines after a tackle by his fellow Lions lock Donncha O'Callaghan.


Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 25 June 2009 8:44 AM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Six Nations
 
1

Daft Old Git,

25/06/2009 00:32:10
Never had a good record since he blotted our record by being the first 'Scot' ever to be sent off in an international
2

loosehead,

Edinburgh 25/06/2009 00:54:52
The Lions` management are right. The citing and the discip sentence were both completely unwarranted. I have seen a replay and it confirmed my original impression. Nathan picked up Steenkamp by gripping him around the thighs. In this situation, the tackled player`s head and shoulders will naturally incline towards the ground. A couple more players joined in and the whole lot went to ground, without Hines losing his grip on the opponent. How this constitutes a spear baffles me. Simply to lift an opponent off the ground in a tackle is not an offence - it`s what happens next that matters. Neither Steenkamp nor the SARFU complained and, as far as I know, Steenkamp was not injured. Neither the referee nor his assistants saw anything untoward, and whether they were called at the discip board is not clear. This was sheer officiousness by the citing commissioner (frrom NZ of all countries!) and a misinterpretation of the Law by the discip board. Please appeal, Wagga.
3

The Federalist (the poster formerly know as NAUON),

25/06/2009 08:01:07
There seems to be one rule for the Lions and no rules for the Springboks on this tour. Some of the officiating and decisions have been appalling.

The only games I have been comfortable with the refereeing was the games against the emerging Boks. Alain Rowland was on the ball - I like him did not think it was a spear tackle.
4

Sgian Dubh,

25/06/2009 08:25:41
It really would take a New Zealander to recognise a 'spear'tackle!
5

leemagee,

Perth 25/06/2009 09:00:07
Every Lions tour has an unjust incident with citing commissioners. They are useless and biased;
2009 - Hines banned for a week for a nothing tackle
2005 - Umaga and Mealamu given no punishment for one of the worst spear tackles every seen
2001 - The Ozzy bloke who punched the hell out of Ronan O'Gara and got a slap on the wrist
1997 - South African lock stamps on Doddie Weir's knee, ending his tour and earning him a tiny ban.

Someone should sit down and define all aspects of illegalities as the millions of grey areas in rugby are the only poor point of the best game in the world.
6

muppetspotter,

Edinburgh 25/06/2009 09:37:46
The IRB and their referees are in danger of making a mockery of the sport witht he complete inconsitency of decision. Whilst Hines may be a fringe player for the test team (I think Shaw gets the nod) he could have been a contender for the bench. This citing incident is a clear exploitation of the system by the SA management team - why didn't they cite Fluety for what seemed a more likely dump tackel in the first minute of the game? Considering the way the Southern Kings carried on last week the Lions Management team were very restrained in not citing any players - here they need to come out fighting and appeal this decision.

Many forums on this subject are full of SA fans accusing us of not taking the rough stuff and whinging - well, actually, we have been taking it without running off to teacher and blubbing like a big girl's blouse about nasty Mr Hines....

this ban should be turned over at appeal - if it is not - it is yet another nail in the coffin of the IRB - along with the experimental laws, the lack of understanding about srcummaging, inconsistent refs..blah blah blah
7

Chief King Bonga,

25/06/2009 10:01:56
This is mad, Its one rule for the Southern Hemisphere teams and one for the Northern, what happened to O Driscol in New Zealand was criminal and nothing happened, much the same as the late tackles that went in during the "friendy" the other week ! where`s the consistancy refs?

England were slaughtered by their refs during the tests last Autumn, and we faired little better in the Six Nations, it could be that only we are doing something that is against the laws of the game, can someone with a better understanding of the rules than I, explain what was going wrong, without the partisan viewpoint if possible !
8

Fat one,

Edinburgh 25/06/2009 12:39:53
Ford is on the bench, the moaning can stop!
9

Aubrey W,

Greater Fyfe 25/06/2009 16:39:27
One or two Scots could still resurface because there are likely to be injuries. Meanwhile, the Lions look outpowered upfront. Fingers crossed for Saturday and here's for a good start!
10

Exiled Bear,

25/06/2009 20:34:01
Amazing that Hines gets a ban for giving something back to the SAffers, as opposed to us constantly taking it.

It is a man's game and it is amazing that the first site (or should that be cite) of post match whingeing has come from the Boks, something for us to take into the 2nd test.

Hopefully the next time the Lions go to Oz or NZ, Robinson will be giving us much more to be excited about with a larger Scottish presence and at least 1/2 players guaranteed a starting slot, the youthfulness of our squad gives me hope.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.