Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Sunday, 23rd November 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

MacPherson asks for a quiet word, not cards



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 25 August 2008
ST MIRREN manager Gus MacPherson admitted that referee Calum Murray had followed the letter of the law by red carding Tonet Guerao at Hearts, but insisted "a quiet word" could have replaced the midfielder's second booking.
The Buddies were reduced to ten men after only 25 minutes of their 2-1 SPL defeat at Tynecastle and the decision proved pivotal as Hearts racked up all three points thanks to a Jamie Mole strike and Michael Stewart's penalty.

However, MacPherson, who failed in a bid to overturn Will Haining's red card from the opening game of the season against Celtic, believes referees should be more lenient when it comes to handing out cards.

"(The sending off] was massive," said MacPherson. "You lose that player, it's always going to be tough.

"By the letter of the law, the tackles were yellow cards, but if there are going to be challenges like that we are going to book every single player with every challenge.

|I think a quiet word would have sufficed with it being so quickly after the first challenge."

MacPherson, however, was proud of his players after they responded bravely to the red card. He added: "We went down to ten men and worked ever so hard.

"The positives are the way we worked because we could easily have capitulated."





The full article contains 227 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

busbyfh,

25/08/2008 13:30:49
As Macpherson says - They were BOTH yellow cards - simple really - OFF you go !

Thomson of Rangers YET AGAIN absolutely hammered someone with a challenge on Saturday that could have merrited a straight yellow , but as he was already on a yellow got a brief talking to from the ref - According to Macpherson that is the way to go. The only way to go with Thomson SHOULD HAVE BEEN bloody off the park.

Thomson gets away with foul after foul every game he plays ....as the old firm game will be watched by "ref watchers" even closer on Sunday - Look out for the ex FFFHibee getting sent off.
2

Lion-O "Lord Of The ThunderCats,

25/08/2008 13:31:32
Watched the highlights online with the BBC so not had the full TV experience yet.

However, even from the online window you can clearly see the first "tackle" is thigh high and a clear yellow. Even an OF player would have been booked for that.

Second tackle was late and from behind and another yellow. Granted Kevin Thomson only got a ticking off for similar at Aberdeen, but he plays for Rangers & Scotland and the St Mirren player doesn't.

Perhaps Gus could copy Alan Curbishly and view the two yellows on the TV before being honest in his interviews?
3

Edinburgh's Big Team,

EH11 25/08/2008 15:20:30
McPherson's point is valid because the inconsistency is astounding. As Hearts supporters we know that refs will apply the letter of the law to some teams/player more than others and these are the ones that benefit the old firm. It is just inconceivable to imagine a rangers player being sent off for Miko's offences at Ibrox. Its the subjective use of the rules and the inconsistency of such decisions that make the SLP an unjust league

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.