Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Sunday, 12th October 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Ambitious exiles on the rise despite SRU snub



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 12 July 2008

LONDON Scottish's new plans to return to the upper echelons of English rugby moved on this week with more signings, which highlighted how reluctance by the Scottish Rugby Union to get more closely involved in the London club was not holding them back.

Iain Fullarton, the former Scotland lock forward, and ex-Wasps captain Paul Volley swell to six the clutch of experienced Premiership players added in recent weeks with the help of a new £1.5million funding package secured by former Scotland backs
Chris Rea and Kenny Logan.

That duo have been working with businessmen across the globe in recent years to successfully attract new funding to Scottish rugby, but most of which the SRU has shown a reluctance to accept.

Nick Evans, the club's general manager, was keen to remain clear of controversy and praised the SRU's commitment to half-funding the London Scottish youth academy. Now running for 18 months and with Rowly Williams, the skills coach at Wasps, the manager, it is beginning to bring through players – Matt Heeks recently joined the senior squad after captaining Scotland U20s in their recent world championships.

Whether it will ever fully replace the network of 2,000-plus qualified young Scots on the database of the old Scottish Exiles system, which the SRU and member clubs voted to scrap two years ago is another issue, but with a new outreach programme and coaching clinics it is starting to build a new Scottish community in the south.

The efforts of the 1st XV to progress back up through the leagues and reassert a presence for London Scottish as a serious club provides the beacon around which such work has a more attractive point, however. Evans is reluctant to talk about the days when Scottish again take on the best in the land, but stated that the new plans were bursting with ambition.

He said: "This is about taking London Scottish back to its roots of being a Scottish club in England which attracts exiles as players and supporters, and ultimately produces Scotland internationalists of the future.

"We have 221 players from the past who have done that and some, like Gavin Hastings and Michael Campbell-Lamerton who went on to captain the Lions, so continuing to build the club while retaining our Scottish core is hugely important.

"Getting back into Premier One is a massive project, so we're not talking about that right now, but National One is realistic within the next three years and that's the plan; it's achievable with our current ground facilities, infrastructure and local audience.

"We averaged between 1,500-2,000 for crowds last season, with more than 2,500 at the pre-season friendly with London Irish, and the season before we had 3,500 for the game with Richmond, who we played again this year on Calcutta Cup day, so there's clearly a market for it locally and with exiled Scots."

At the moment, while the club is in National 3 of the English league system, fringe players and those coming to the end of their careers are being attracted by a club on the up, but the SRU's recent decision to step back from what London Scottish believed to be an agreement to send south fringe pros from here, and provide some financial support to strengthen the relationship, may come back to haunt them if 'Scottish' continue their ascent.

The SRU is clearly concerned with keeping spending within tight controls, and continuing to reduce the overdraft, and state that they will revisit involvement when the club is higher up the leagues. But such is the support now growing around Richmond – a number of high-level investors are involved in Rea and Logan's recent funding package and Roehampton University are now offering young players bursaries – the SRU may struggle to find a way in the future.

As well as Heeks, Ian McInroy, Callum Grant, Mark Douglas, Scott Hadden, Rob MacPherson Smith, a youngster on exchange from Natal, and Rowan Brown, brother of Scotland back-row, Kelly, are all current Scots on the books at Richmond. Evans added: "We are working hard at investing in the community and academy to set up a structure that will produce Scottish players and give the club a real Scottish identity.

"We are an exiles club and we do encourage all nationalities, but in terms of the relationship with Scotland we want to continue to get back to our traditions.

"It's a long-term investment, and the SRU is helping with the academy. We've always maintained an open dialogue with the union and will continue to work with them to achieve our ambitions."

The SRU's decision to step back from involvement with the 1st XV squad may turn out to be a minor spat easily overcome or something more far-reaching, but as we watch the laudable ambition of a proud, reviving 'Scottish' club in the English capital one must hope that any potential to benefit the wider Scottish game is not missed.







The full article contains 843 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 11 July 2008 9:39 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Foresight,

By the Water of Leith 12/07/2008 08:24:39

The SRU's abject failure to encourage the ambitions of London Scottish cannot be written off as a spat. Sadly over the years it has been abundantly evident that there is institutional apathy within the SRU against LS. They remain blind to the passion that exists in London ex-pats for Scottish rugby and it is to their shame that their attitude somehow or other never changes.

2

jdships,

12/07/2008 10:04:01
1 Foresight

Good post.
The SRU do not sem to be aware of the number of rugby players with Scot's connections living/working in LS catchment area.
My g son , who plays Premier League, worked in London last season for three months last season and joined up with LS.
He was absolutely taken aback by the numbers involved and the enthusiasm shown throughout the club.

I played a few games for them backin the 1950's when they ran six teams at least.
Things were somewhat different then !
Gordon Waddle was Scotland standoff and was picked for a "trial" .
His brother Alan , who played for LS "two's", was also picked , much to the annoyance of the press.
I think it was the "Scotsman" who carried an article suggesting that if a pair of boots could have been found , to fit her, that Mrs Waddle would also have been picked !!
3

Fast Phil,

12/07/2008 12:59:52
Why should the SRU invest money outside of Scotland?

Money should be spent on grassroots rugby in Scotland and underpinning the Pro teams.

For all that LS may be ambitious there are many other clubs in the leagues above them who are equally and if not more ambitious. They will have a hard time.

4

,

13/07/2008 10:36:22
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
5

B.McGeek,

13/07/2008 20:38:19
Well done at least something is moving forward - good luck.

As i have asked, and wondered many times what about the academy players? are they involved in the club set up? who decides who is in the academy? How much money is the sru shelling out on players who are obviously never going to be international standard but continue to get academy contracts renewed.I know of one back who was injured most of last season and the season before, so hardly plays! who has had his contract renewed,also a forward who was a fringe player with the borders who was given an academy contract and he is still in the academy after two years with no apparent sign of progression,meanwhile at least two younger players of the same position have secured full time contracts! Question; what is the development structure and where is it going. why is this infomation not made public?
6

,

14/07/2008 00:08:03
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
7

,

14/07/2008 07:23:06
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
8

RodB,

London 14/07/2008 10:02:26
As there are thousands of young Scots living and working in London, never mind those who are first generation Londoners, it is surely very short sighted of the SRU not to look to provide support.
With only 2 pro teams in Scotland, LS gaining promotion in a few years to Division 1 or the possibility of them playing in the premiership would provide an incredible proving ground for Scots qualified players and could significantly help the quality of the whole Scottish team, as I think most independents agree that the Guinness premiership is the most competitive league in the World.
Though maybe as part of an SRU investment, one of the terms is that at all levels the LS No 10 must be Scots qualified, as there appears to be no sign of a quality international coming out of Scotland!!!
9

J.A.,

14/07/2008 10:31:00
Not to say that I am happy about SRU funds being spend in London when they can barely afford to fund things up here. It is abundantly clear that the SRU have a difficulty working in partnership with or trust prospective backers to run things their own way. The Edinburgh/Caruthers debacle of last year and the appalling manner they treated Melrose over the IRB 7’s are two very good examples.
10

John not from the Borders,

Haddington 14/07/2008 14:37:26
I don't disagree with anything that has been said before but the simple fact is that we don't have the money. Would P1 clubs be very happy to see a club playing at a lower standard than them, receive considerably more funding than they get from the SRU. The answer is no.

If private investors are digging into their pockets, good for them. Encourage LS with the support structures, like the academy however, we want more clubs being set-up which don't require significant SRU funding because, they can't afford it.
11

,

15/07/2008 13:11:48
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
12

royco,

16/07/2008 07:08:03
Does every issue in Scottish rugby have to start with the refrain: "We don't have any money"? If you start from this doom-monger standpoint, it means nothing can ever be done - yet strangely things are being done.

How true is it anyway? The overdraft is reducing by £2m a year, it's down from £24m to £17m. The current debt is down to £15m. The SRU announced a record income for last year, up to £28m. You can do a lot with £28m. Additionally, there will reportedly be a one-third increase in media revenue starting 2010, worth another £3m a year. So the position is looking a lot better, there is money, it just needs to be spent judiciously.

The bottom line is that Scotland has two Pro teams and the equivalent of a third playing in the GP, ML or French S14. Ireland and Wales have 4, England 12, France 14. So we will always be at a disadvantage when it comes to putting out a competitive national 6N side, not enough numbers to choose from.

There is not the money/political will to launch a 3rd home-based Pro team unless private investors are involved, but the SRU and private investors are oil and water. So next best bet is to back LS and tap into a new stream of exiled players and see how far it goes. The obstacle is not the fact that the SRU can't afford to loan half a dozen fringe pros or make a small beer investment, it's that there are two strands of domestic rugby opinion against it.

One is the clubs saying any spare money should go to us. They have a point, though there will be a lot more money this season for the clubs. Of course money to clubs has to be balanced against the interest of the Pro and national teams as well. The other is the view that no money should go south of the border, it's oor money. That is a less productive, less objective line of reasoning. Parochial misses tricks.

A semi Pro or Pro team in the south in a year or three can only be to the advantage of Scottish rugby.


13

bigmac55,

South of the Wall .... 16/07/2008 10:49:29
don't confuse lower level with lower standard ... LS may play at Level 4 in the English set up but the standard is every bit as good as BT Premiership ... possibly better... Anyone not sure of this should take the opportunity of going to LS to watch a game. The only players in the Squad who have not played National 1 (England level 2) or higher level rugby are the youngsters the club has developed itself.
14

Richard Pope,

Dubai 04/08/2008 11:39:37
up the scottish! boo to the sru! the way scottish have gone about climbing back up the leagues should be an inspiration to all including the boo sru who quite honestly could do with losing some of their increadible arrogance and take heed...because the state of rugby up north is in fine fettle..errr....I also look forward to the national team being full of scottish and seeing the alistair campbell type spin the fools in the sru give out when asking 'why do most of the team play in south london' and 'wasnt it right that you left them out to rot' and 'how great it is to see one of the oldest clubs in the world soar from the ashes of adversity' and 'how much credit do you claim for scottish wining the european cup...??!!!!!!' COME ON SCOTTISH and cant wait to dick richmond again this year!!!!!! london scottish in dubai (there are a few i've come across...!)

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.