Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Sunday, 23rd November 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Trouble forecast as new rule proposals split rugby opinion



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 17 July 2008
MAGNER'S League boss David Jordan insists the competition will be played under experimental laws next season despite Scotland's Celtic partners claiming to have opted out.
A storm is brewing in rugby circles over the refusal of Ireland, Wales and England to trial laws that include a requirement for defences to stand five metres back at scrums, allow mauls to be collapsed and have free kicks instead of penalties for all
offences except offside and foul play – reducing the number of shots at goal.

Disagreements are threatening to have a profound effect on all cross-border competitions including the Heineken European Cup and internationals – a doubly disappointing situation according to Scottish coach Ian Rankin, who has just returned from the annual Six Nations conference in Rome, where experimental laws were the hot topic. Making it clear that he expected Scotland to stand firm in implementing the changes, Jordan said: "The Magner's Celtic League is governed by the International Rugby Board and will be following their instructions."

According to Rankin, rugby will be much improved as a spectacle and the former Edinburgh guru, now at Dundee High in the Scottish Hydro Electric Premiership, said it was important for Scotland to be in the vanguard of change.

Rankin said: "With rugby now a global game thanks partly to the influence of television it is important to have decisions more clear-cut wherever possible and the experimental laws (which will be reviewed at the end of 2008-09) are aimed at that. We have to appeal to more spectators. When the whistle goes in football either somebody is offside or else a player has been kicked. In rugby there is still too much riding on the referee's decision – any one of about ten offences might have been spotted in a ruck.

"If I have a criticism of the changes it is that they don't go far enough to make the ruck more clear-cut and, maybe if handling the ball had been allowed, decisions might have become more transparent.

"The law-makers stepped back from that one but maybe once things bed down there will be scope to return to the ruck area.

"Otherwise rugby is going to be all the better for what is being proposed and I speak as the only person at the conference who had coached under the new laws because of Scotland's decision to trial them in the Super Cup a couple of seasons ago.

"In Rome we were working with the Italian under-19 squad and the players certainly liked the changes, which is the most important aspect. They'll let you know quicker than anybody if something isn't right.

"Games will be more dynamic and I have a feeling those countries that don't embrace the changes might be left behind.

"Tradition is all very well but rugby has to move with the times. There is a need for more creativity and the Rome conference was invigorating – especially as we saw the impact of the changes in the Tri Nations match immediately afterwards between New Zealand and South Africa, who took advantage of extra space to score a try off the back row of a scrum."

Appealing for rifts between the home unions to be healed as quickly as possible, Rankin added: "What has to be avoided is different rules for different competitions with players jumping from one set to another."

At the same time Rankin admits his involvement has perhaps enabled him to steal a march on domestic rivals .

"All coaches inevitably look at see how far they can stretch the laws to their advantage and there was certainly plenty of food for thought in Rome where delegates included top South African coach Rudi Joubert, former Italian scrum half Alessandro Troncon and ex British Lions second row Jeremy Davidson, who is also cutting his teeth in coaching.

"Mark Lawrence of South African, who refereed recent Super 14 matches under the experimental laws was also present and what struck me was that with mauls able to be pulled down coaches will expect the ball carrier to be positioned near to the rear-most foot.

"Key player in most matches will be the scrum half, who must not only have a lightning pass but the ability to exploit quick tap-and-go situations, although the recent Tri Nations matches showed a willingness to opt for scrums instead of free kicks.

"That extra fluency should ideally suit the French who want to run the ball more than most but overall my impression is that Scottish coaches, considering the (small) base we have to work from, are as creative as anyone."





The full article contains 778 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 17 July 2008 10:55 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Jaebee,

Peebles 18/07/2008 07:59:02
Hope its not oo long before the laws are unified for all levels of 15 a side games. Chopping and changinge and having different tournaments using different ELVs makes a mockery of it all. It was much better when ELVs were introduced for everyone without differentiation.
2

JCA REID,

Annan 19/07/2008 14:31:35
The ELV's will knacker up the Scottish sides' ability to score points i.e. fewer penalty goals & force them to go for tries. It will compel them to play modern rugby.
3

RSF1,

Edinburgh 19/07/2008 21:36:59
Eh, where in the ELV's does it say penalties are going to be replaced by free kicks?????
Please read the ELV's before printing tosh which just confuses people and if you're not going to bother then don't write anything!

Law 6 - Match Officials

1 Assistant referees are able to assist the referee in any way that the referee requires.

Law 17 - Maul

2 Remove reference to head and shoulders not being lower than hips.

3 Players are able to defend a maul by pulling it down.

Law 19 - Touch and Lineout

4 If a team puts the ball back into its own 22 and the ball is subsequently kicked directly into touch, there is no gain in ground.

5 A quick throw in may be thrown in straight or towards the throwing team’s own goal line.

6 There is no restriction on the number of players from either team who can participate in the lineout.

7 The receiver at the lineout must be 2 metres away from the lineout.

8 The player who is in opposition to the player throwing in the ball must stand in the area between the 5-metre line and the touch line but must be 2 metres away from the 5-metre line.

9 Lineout players may pre-grip a jumper before the ball is thrown in.

10 The lifting of lineout players is permitted.

Law 20 - Scrum

11 Introduction of an offside line 5 metres behind the hindmost feet of the scrum.

12 Identification of scrum half offside lines.

Law 22 – Corner Posts

13 The corner posts are no longer considered to be touch-in-goal except when the ball is grounded against the post.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.