Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Sisters blind to new world order

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 09 September 2007
THERE are none as blind as those who will not see and when it comes to the Williams sisters, they simply refuse to look around them.
Venus Williams' loss on Friday night to Justine Henin in the semi finals of the US Open should have come as a salutary lesson to the older of the playing sisters, but instead the result was brushed aside, explained away by tales of illness and dizziness. Venus was not in tip-top form, she felt "sick to her stomach" and Henin "played well".

The fact that Henin - who was having physical problems of her own - out-witted, out-played, out-hit and out-thought Williams seemed not to matter to America's first family of tennis. The Belgian has been struggling with breathing problems for months and, in the less-than-clean air of the Big Apple, she has been suffering for the past few days. No matter, she was still fitter, faster and stronger than her rival despite conceding eight inches in height and 34lbs in muscle. She was also choked by nerves at several points during her 7-6, 6-4 victory and still she found a way to win.

The American journalists, who have a cosier relationship with the Williams camp than any other media group, immediately sought out Oracene Price, the mother of Venus and Serena. From Ms Price, they learned that Venus had been ill for a while. She may have anaemia, she may have an inner ear infection but, either way, she has not been right since Wimbledon. And yet Venus, who only admitted after her loss to Henin that she had been "trying to keep the points short" throughout the championships, had clearly been the woman in form until she met the world No.1.

If, indeed, Williams has an inner ear problem, it is a condition that needs to be addressed quickly. When Alicia Molik was felled by a similar complaint in 2005, she missed more than a year of tournament play. From a career high ranking of No.8 in the world, she fell off the map and is only now, two years later, back up to No.69 in the world pecking order.

Yet illnesses and excuses notwithstanding, there is a small shift in momentum to be registered with this loss. Henin's win over Venus came one round after her win over Serena - and that was only the second time that anyone had beaten both sisters at a major tournament (Martina Hingis was the first back in 2001 at the Australian Open). To ram the point home: Henin had beaten them on their own turf, on a hard court, on their favourite surface.

Due to the vagaries of scheduling, seeding and the Williams' playing programme, Venus and Henin had not met in four and a half years. And prior to Friday night's encounter, Henin had lost all but one of their eight matches. As expected on Friday, Williams looked at Mighty Mouse across the net and served big, hit bigger and waited for the inevitable result. But Henin had changed in those intervening years and Venus, in a nutshell, hadn't. Neither had Serena in the round before.

"They still do the same thing as five years ago," Henin explained simply and quietly. "I change my point of view when I play against them. I still have a lot of respect, but I'm not scared any more. It's been really, really important to me in this tournament to play both of them. It was a great challenge and I did it, so it's great.

"They both have a lot of personality and a lot of character and I think they are both great champions. I can admit that, and it's tough to play against them. But you should ask them what they feel about my game."

And there's the rub: neither Venus nor Serena take the oppositions' game into consideration. As Serena snarled when asked if it had been a case of her losing to Henin rather than Henin beating her: " I think that's usually the case with me, that it's for me to win or lose."

That Richard Williams and Oracene Price brought their two daughters as far as they did speaks volumes about their daughters' natural talent, athleticism and fighting spirit. But that when the sisters reached the top, the fact that neither they nor their parents thought to employ a recognised tennis authority to continue their development says more about their lack of understanding about the modern game.

Serena is the fighter of the clan and her champion's heart has won her several major titles from a standing start, this year's Australian Open being a case in point. But for her to succeed, she needs the opposition to be scared of her. Now that Henin has beaten her in three consecutive grand slam quarter finals, on three different surfaces, the fear factor in Belgium, at least, will be considerably diminished. It will not be long before word spreads in the locker room and the young names, such as Ana Ivanovic and Jelena Jankovic, look at Serena as just another old dinosaur waiting to be beaten.

Venus, meanwhile, has won just three titles in the past two years. Two of those trophies have come at Wimbledon - and that is where she feels most at home - but she plays more than her sister, puts herself in position to win more than her sister, and yet still comes up empty handed more often than not.

Venus is now 27, Serena will be 26 at the end of this month. Both of them are set in their ways and both of them are, by tennis standards, old. Both might have another grand slam title or so in them but with a technique that was made up along the way by their mum and dad, they become more vulnerable the older they get.

The rags-to-riches story of the Williams sisters is a fabulous tale of winning against all odds. In their pomp, they were remarkable players but the tragedy is that they could have been so much better. The pity was that they refused to look around them.

The full article contains 1038 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 08 September 2007 9:05 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: The Williams sisters
 
1

leverne,

maryland, usa 09/09/2007 00:35:49

I love the Williams' sisters, and have enjoyed watching them play. They have done the world of tennis nothing but good, but I have to agree with you. They do need to consider new coaching if they want to step up their game and compete with the rest. It's obvious that their game has been studied and figured out. Its time for new strategies. I noticed that when Serena played Henin, she was unable to figure out what to do, and just seemed to get frustrated, which is just self defeating. I believe Venus simply succumbed to too much pressure placed on her because of Serena's loss. She just couldn't take it, and the fact that they don't play that many tournaments, may have contributed to a lack of stamina. Nevertheless, they are strong athletes who have it in them to come back even stronger.

2

bunnz,

england 10/09/2007 09:42:42

Whoever wrote the article in question must be reminded that Roger federer, the undisputed no.1 in men's tennis is also 26 years old which you have refered to as "old" in the case of Venus and serena. I watched Venus at wimbledon and she was absolutely in stunning form. Also, it may do you some good to remember that Justine is the world number one and a fantastic player in her own right, who was embarassed by Marion Bartoli at the last wimbledon. Its the beauty of the game and no conclusions should be drawn too quickly because Venus in particular has a habit of surprising her critics. Both williams are, as i speak still in the top 10 and both can rise and reclaim the number one spot. I strongly believe your article would have been different if Venus had won instead of henin in their quarterfinal at the u.s open.And let me finish by saying two great athletes in their mid to late twenties shouyld never be considered old or "dinosaur like" like you suggest in your article. They are head and shoulders above most if not all women tennis players as athleticism is concerned and can continue to be for a few good years stil, if they train and stay fit. Underestimate them at your own peril, the williams sisters are stil very much here.

3

Faizal Deen Forrester,

Canada 12/09/2007 16:14:45

I will be writing something on these topics in fuller detail elsewhere but, for now, a comment.

It surprises me that no one has taken seeding into consideration where the Williams sisters are concerned.

While they defied the seeds at the Australian Open and at Wimbledon, respectfully, both sisters used those victories to catapult themselves back into the Top Ten.

No mean feat.

As a result, everyone expects them to win everything.

It doesn't matter that Serena played according to her ranking of 7th or 8th in the world and came out with respectable quarterfinal finishes in the last three Slams, not to mention her two titles earlier this year.

Ranked 7th and seeded 8th (or vice versa), a quarterfinal finish is exactly where she should end up at this point in her "comeback."

Those who expect her to be beating Henin consistently are obviously delusional when it comes to the realities of the physical and mental challenges of a career in tennis. And not just any career but one that is pretty near the top.

As for Venus, her comeback is even more spectacular. She managed to climb back into the Top Ten by playing beyond her rank and seed. Winning Wimbledon because of the Bartoli factor and how it surprised Henin on grass; and then clobbering the competition at Flushing Meadows up until her ineveitable encounter with the best in the game.

Therefore, the fact that the "comebacks" for both Venus and Serena have meant two more slams to their already remarkable careers, give or take a few movie appearances, lines of clothing or whatever, should be what matters and what counts the most in the final analysis of the WTA in 2007, as it pertains to them.

They both lost to Henin. But why is that surprising to anyone? Henin is the top seed. She's supposed to play the way she has and she is supposed to take it all/win it all.

Why should this be a warning to the Williams? Why should it be constructe


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.